Re: review request (L): 7030453: JSR 292 ClassValue.get method is too slow

? enumConstants and enumConstantDirectory seem good candidates (callers cache the value anyway or do additional work while accessing the field). -- Florian Weimer BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe

Re: thinking about proper implementation of tail calls

* John Rose: > As I recall, Doug Lea noted at the 2010 JVM Language Summit that > tail calls would seem to allow work-stealing algorithms to be > implemented somewhat more cleanly or efficiently. (How's that for > tentative?) A worker thread goes from task to task in a data-driven > way, similar

Re: thinking about proper implementation of tail calls

* Remi Forax: >> I would be surprised if tail calls give more flexibility. Usually >> it's the opposite, the mini-interpreter wins in terms of flexibility: >> >> > > This trick can work with a lexer because usually you don't keep states > between e

Re: Latest experiments...happiness and sadness

* Remi Forax: > Even a simple code like the one below, there is no scalar replacement > (OSR or not), > Float f = new Float(0); > for(int i=0; if = new Float(f + 1.0f); > } > float result = f; > System.out.println(result); Last time I looked at this, scalar repl

Defining anonymous classes

-level language construct of the same name. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Re: Defining anonymous classes

Anonymous classes look very useful for run-time code generation. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Re: Defining anonymous classes

ame if you don't use the class loader which was used to define the class to look up the name? -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Shortcut for obtaining a MethodHandle for an anonymous code fragment

Is it true that there is no shortcut for obtaining a method handle for some code fragment? That is, there is no way to write something like this? MethodHandle repeatIt = (String x) -> x + x; Instead it's necessary to give the expression a name and put it into a static method somewhere, and obt

Re: Shortcut for obtaining a MethodHandle for an anonymous code fragment

* Vladimir Ivanov: >> Is it true that there is no shortcut for obtaining a method handle for >> some code fragment? >> >> That is, there is no way to write something like this? >> >>MethodHandle repeatIt = (String x) -> x + x; >> >> Instead it's necessary to give the expression a name and p