mantic details should be.
If any one of you you have any input, comments or advice, please share, I
read this list daily.
best wishes,
Tobias Ivarsson
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
Hi,
I keep getting "500 - Internal Server Error" from hg.openjdk.java.net. Does
anyone here know who to contact about this issue? And if it's not going to
be fixed soon, does anyone have an up to date clone that I can use?
Thanks
/Tobias
___
mlvm-dev ma
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> Tobias Ivarsson a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I keep getting "500 - Internal Server Error" from hg.openjdk.java.net
> > <http://hg.openjdk.java.net>. Does anyone here know who to contact
> > about th
, Remi.)
>
> It would be great to get an update on how these sub-projects are
> going, what they are (currently, realistically) aiming to achieve,
> etc. Perhaps the people involved can give us a brief status update?
Of course, that's an excellent suggestion. I (Tobias Ivarsso
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:43 AM, John Rose wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2008, at 2:55 AM, Tobias Ivarsson wrote:
>
> *John*: last time you and I spoke about this you said that you were going
> to start working on some core implementation details. Have you had time to
> look into that?
&g
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>
>
>
> Create a MOP is you have MethodHandles is more easier than without :)
> But how to handle the case where you want to call a ruby method with
> a PHP object.
This is what Interface Injection aims to solve.
When the JRuby runtime recevie
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 2:54 AM, John Rose wrote:
> I'm pushing method handles changes to JDK7 these days. Here's the first:
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-comp/hotspot/rev/56aae7be60d4
>
> The next one is imminent; see review request below. This one refactors
> interface dispatchin
Just thought I'd download the binaries and see if they worked on Mac OS
10.4:
~/Desktop/j2sdk-image tobias$ ./bin/java -version
Bus error
So I guess I'll stick with Linux, hope that the current focus on being able
to build the MLVM on Mac doesn't make it unbuildable on Linux systems.
/Tobias
On
ranch compiles
> there, but I could not get it patched.
> Do you have any patching trick to share ?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Chanwit
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> > Tobias Ivarsson a écrit :
> >> Just thought I'd download the binari
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Chanwit Kaewkasi wrote:
> Hello Tobias,
>
> Here's my error message:
>
> In file included from
> ../../../src/share/native/java/lang/fdlibm/src/k_standard.c:27In file
> included from
> ../../../src/share/native/java/lang/fdlibm/src/k_rem_pio2.c:143:
> ../../../src
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Fredrik Öhrström <
fredrik.ohrst...@oracle.com> wrote:
> What is the purpose of being able to invoke the constructor
> through a MethodHandle? The reason I am asking is because
> to me, it seems like we cannot perform a new through
> a MethodHandle. Which means that
Hi, Emmanuel.
Welcome!
I download the binary plugs from:
http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7/
Sounds like an interesting project you have. Have you joined the
jvm-languages group? ( http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages ), it
would be nice to get some of your progress updates there!
Ch
The bsd-port builds on Linux as well.
You might need a few patches though.
This thread was helpful for me when I rebased the interface injection patch
last week:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/mlvm-dev/2009-April/000486.html
With those instructions I managed to get the build working on Ubu
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> Le 27/01/2010 02:09, John Rose a écrit :
> > On Jan 26, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Mark Mahieu wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 26 Jan 2010, at 22:01, John Rose wrote:
> >>
> >>> Shall we do some more? (Just wondering about it today. No special
> reason... :
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Attila Szegedi wrote:
> On 2010.03.17., at 12:06, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 11:54 +0100, Attila Szegedi wrote:
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> just noticed something strange. Java SE 6 Update 18 Release Notes at <
> http://java.sun.com/javase/6
It does indeed. Am I reading this correctly that we will now(/soon) be able
to create proxies for abstract classes?
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wrote:
> Well this one looks interesting. I'm generating several thousand such
> abstract adapters; this would allow me to pot
16 matches
Mail list logo
