> De: "John Rose" <john.r.r...@oracle.com>
> À: "Per Bothner" <p...@bothner.com>
> Cc: "Da Vinci Machine Project" <mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net>
> Envoyé: Lundi 26 Juin 2017 00:21:58
> Objet: Re: constant-dynamic specification, updated
On Jun 25, 2017, at 3:00 PM, Per Bothner wrote:
>
> That will be difficult as long as constant pool indexes and various
> other fields are limited to 16 bits.
Yep; that's a challenge, until we break the glass and make a
completely new class file format that integrates a
On 06/25/2017 02:34 PM, John Rose wrote:
My overall goal is to keep the classfile alive as an efficient
medium for more and more advanced language runtimes.
That will be difficult as long as constant pool indexes and various
other fields are limited to 16 bits.
--
--Per Bothner
On Jun 25, 2017, at 12:47 PM, Mark Roos wrote:
>
> I was looking for boot strap args to allow byte[] constants from the
> constantPool.
>
> Is that planned?
Yes; there are two more CP types planned:
1. CONSTANT_Data = arbitrary blob of octets
2. CONSTANT_Group = series of
Thx John.
I was looking for boot strap args to
allow byte[] constants from the constantPool.
Is that planned?
mark
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
Date: June 24, 2017 at 4:52:04 PM PDT
To: valhalla-spec-expe...@openjdk.java.net
I have updated the javadoc API that is relevant to the proposed
JVM features for dynamic constants and more powerful bootstrap
methods.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/jvm/condy-jvms-2017-0620.html
Here is a