Re: Getting back into indy...need a better argument collector!

On 11/01/2016, 11:27, "mlvm-dev on behalf of MacGregor, Duncan (GE Energy Management)" wrote: >On 11/01/2016, 03:16, "mlvm-dev on behalf of Charles Oliver Nutter" > >wrote: >... >>With asCollector: 16-17s per iteration >> >>With hand-written array construction: 7-8s per iteration >> >>A sampling

Re: Getting back into indy...need a better argument collector!

Thanks Duncan. I will try to look under the covers this evening. - Charlie (mobile) On Jan 14, 2016 14:39, "MacGregor, Duncan (GE Energy Management)" < duncan.macgre...@ge.com> wrote: > On 11/01/2016, 11:27, "mlvm-dev on behalf of MacGregor, Duncan (GE Energy > Management)" duncan.macgre...@ge.c