Re: [9] RFR (XS): 8059455: LambdaForm.prepare() does unnecessary work for cached LambdaForms
Thanks, Paul. Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov On 4/23/15 6:30 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: On Apr 23, 2015, at 5:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov vladimir.x.iva...@oracle.com wrote: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059455 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8059455/webrev.00/ LambdaForm.compileToBytecode() does unnecessary work (constructs invokerType check an assertion) before ensuring that LambdaForm hasn't been already compiled. It happens very often for cached LambdaForms. The fix is to do the check first. +1 Paul. Testing: failed VM tests (timeouts) Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
Re: [9] RFR (XS): 8059455: LambdaForm.prepare() does unnecessary work for cached LambdaForms
On Apr 23, 2015, at 5:12 PM, Vladimir Ivanov vladimir.x.iva...@oracle.com wrote: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059455 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8059455/webrev.00/ LambdaForm.compileToBytecode() does unnecessary work (constructs invokerType check an assertion) before ensuring that LambdaForm hasn't been already compiled. It happens very often for cached LambdaForms. The fix is to do the check first. +1 Paul. Testing: failed VM tests (timeouts) Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
