See here someone who got the same problem as you:
http://groups.google.fr/group/mochikit/browse_frm/thread/1f83acd42a1cd4e0/5a64c7c40769ccd1?q=targetrnum=1#5a64c7c40769ccd1
To make it quick, I think the simplest way to handle it is in your
code, by passing the element you connect to with a
You have a chance for to earn money. You need to believe only!
Trust in GOD and believe that you can! I challenge you to click here:
http://www.geocities.com/marylinminsk7/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Typically, if you pass an element to an event handler via partial that
references the element that is registering the handler it will cause a
memory leak in IE. But I assume this will not happen with
MochiKit.Signal since DOM handlers are unregistered during the window
unload event. Is this
Thanks folks. Seems clear enough We'll take a stab at it and let the
group know how it turns out.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
MochiKit group.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi,
I'm fairly new to this group, but am impressed that at last FP is
coming of age in a non-niche (aka non-academic) fashion. (That's a bit
rich cos I worked alot in acedmia!).
Are there any plans to 'extend' (no pun) or perhaps promote the
functional capabilities of Mochikit aka Haskell
Signal should not leak no matter what you do. That said, please do
test your code with Drip and let me know if you find any problems.
On 21-Mar-06, at 7:36 AM, Doug Crawford wrote:
Typically, if you pass an element to an event handler via partial that
references the element that is
Markus, we need to see a simple test case that demonstrates the
problem before we can do anything. If you see this again, please make
a simple HTML document that demonstrates the problem, and I'll do my
best to address it.
Thanks!
On 12-Mar-06, at 9:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have an example of how to setup or use Deferred Chains
where a callback returns another Deferred instance. I am having
trouble understanding what is supposed to happen with any return value
from a Deferred callback function. Is this return value used as the
first calling argument
On Mar 21, 2006, at 2:45 PM, Doug Crawford wrote:Does anyone have an example of how to setup or use Deferred Chainswhere a callback returns another Deferred instance. I am havingtrouble understanding what is supposed to happen with any return valuefrom a Deferred callback function. Is this
On Mar 21, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Doug Crawford wrote:Thanks, I am starting to understand this stuff but not completely. Inyour example you never explicitly call e.addCallback() so when you calle.callback("write this") how does the e object choose the rightcallback function?When a Deferred ends up in
Doug, thank you for the great test case. I'll get on this and let you
know what I can do.
On 21-Mar-06, at 2:38 PM, Doug Crawford wrote:
Here is simple test case that shows a leak in Drip 0.3 using the
latest
640 version of MochiKit. This is basically the same test case that I
On Mar 21, 2006, at 5:24 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Mar 21, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Doug Crawford wrote:
I thought I could restructure the example slightly and still get the
same end result but the following example does not print write
this.
I am sure it is obvious why this similar example
12 matches
Mail list logo
