[mochikit] problem with Effect.fade (opacity) in IE7 with scriptaculous, test included

2007-01-16 Thread mwaschkowski
Hi, I'm getting an error in IE7 with the test case included at bottom which just trys to do an Effect.Fade. If I comment out mochikit, the page works fine. Does this mean Mochikit and scriptaculous are incompatible? I'm using mochikit version from subversion downloaded today (Jan 16, 2006)

[mochikit] Re: problem with Effect.fade (opacity) in IE7 with scriptaculous, test included

2007-01-16 Thread Karl Guertin
On 1/16/07, mwaschkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any ideas? MochiKit's $ function is clobbering Prototype's. I don't know if Scriptaculous is breaking because of this, but I wouldn't be surprised. If you move the MochiKit src above the other two, it should work.

[mochikit] Re: problem with Effect.fade (opacity) in IE7 with scriptaculous, test included

2007-01-16 Thread mwaschkowski
Ya, that works great, problem is gone (so there IS a problem with Mochikit's $ function clobbering Prototype and impacting scriptaculous). Thanks for the help! Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[mochikit] Re: problem with Effect.fade (opacity) in IE7 with scriptaculous, test included

2007-01-16 Thread Thomas Hervé
mwaschkowski a écrit : Ya, that works great, problem is gone (so there IS a problem with Mochikit's $ function clobbering Prototype and impacting scriptaculous). Or there's a problem with scriptaculous using $ function. It depends of the point of view :). The best way to handle this is to

[mochikit] Re: problem with Effect.fade (opacity) in IE7 with scriptaculous, test included

2007-01-16 Thread mwaschkowski
Actually, this still no worky :( If I MochiKit.js loads first, firefox 2.0 doesn't work, and if it loads last, IE7 doesn't work! Here is a testcase using the export false, and it doesn't work in Firefox 2.0 (gives an Effect not defined error as if the scriptaculous lib didn't get loaded). If

[mochikit] add custom attributes with setNodeAttribute

2007-01-16 Thread dnuske
Hi, I'm adding an atribute called 'tag' (is hard to chosse one name) with setNodeAttribute to attach one value that I would use soon, in FFox it's all OK, in IE this is a little bit harder, but works. Is it a bery bad practice? what you think?

[mochikit] [patch] Problems with showElement

2007-01-16 Thread Nigel McNie
Hi, While using MochiKit.DOM's showElement function, I have come across some wierd behaviour that I believe is worthy of a fix. showElement always sets the display of the element to show to 'block', regardless of the element's type (it's a partial application of this.setDisplayForElement to

[mochikit] Re: [patch] Problems with showElement

2007-01-16 Thread Bob Ippolito
On 1/16/07, Nigel McNie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, While using MochiKit.DOM's showElement function, I have come across some wierd behaviour that I believe is worthy of a fix. showElement always sets the display of the element to show to 'block', regardless of the element's type (it's a

[mochikit] Re: problem with Effect.fade (opacity) in IE7 with scriptaculous, test included

2007-01-16 Thread mwaschkowski
Well, there seems to be a bit of a problem with Mochikit and Scriptaculous, but I can't definitively say what is is, all I can say is the noted problem and solution. Noted problem: scriptaculous library would work fine in IE7 but not Firefox2.0 when loading as such: script type=text/javascript