[mochikit] Re: MochiQuery

2008-06-17 Thread troels knak-nielsen
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 6:23 AM, machineghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So before I waste a bunch of time trying to fix such issues, I thought it might help to ask if anyone else had played around with this sort of thing before. Or for that matter, is anyone actually using anything like this?

[mochikit] Re: MochiQuery

2008-06-17 Thread machineghost
So first off I should clarify: I am NOT proposing this for inclusion in MochiKit. This is just a random little tweak that I thought other people might be interested in or might have experimented with already. If I were proposing anything, it'd be more like a new alternate optional library (but

[mochikit] Re: MochiQuery

2008-06-17 Thread troels knak-nielsen
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 5:07 PM, machineghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Chainability: with this syntax you can chain functions do stuff like: someObject.update(updateObject1).update(updateObject2); True, that _is_ something that can't be done with function-oriented syntax. Personally,

[mochikit] Re: MochiQuery

2008-06-17 Thread Per Cederberg
I haven't tried jQuery, but l find myself browsing through the Prototype API:s from time to time. And as far as I can see, it seems to provide much the same functionality like MochiKit, but with an object-oriented syntax and approach (extending built-in object prototypes with stuff that should