Re: FCC authentication with QMI over MBIM; try 1

2016-06-10 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 14:31 -0700, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote: > > > > > > > > On a unrelated note: my 4G signal is rather poor. Mobile phone > > > typically flips back and forth between 2g and 3g. I have the > > > feeling > > > that the Sierra

Re: FCC authentication with QMI over MBIM; try 1

2016-06-10 Thread Aleksander Morgado
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Stefan Armbruster wrote: > I have not done enough testing but it seems to work so far. I've cold > booted the machine and got "power state: on" on `mmcli -l 0` - so fcc > auth seems to be done. After a suspend/resume cycle I also got a > connection to my mobile p

Re: FCC authentication with QMI over MBIM; try 1

2016-06-10 Thread Aleksander Morgado
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote: >> On a unrelated note: my 4G signal is rather poor. Mobile phone >> typically flips back and forth between 2g and 3g. I have the feeling >> that the Sierra modem does not really fall back to 2g. The connection >> is established very fast and rep

Re: FCC authentication with QMI over MBIM; try 1

2016-06-10 Thread Bjørn Mork
Stefan Armbruster writes: > On a unrelated note: my 4G signal is rather poor. Mobile phone > typically flips back and forth between 2g and 3g. I have the feeling > that the Sierra modem does not really fall back to 2g. The connection > is established very fast and reproducible, I do get IP addres

Re: FCC authentication with QMI over MBIM; try 1

2016-06-10 Thread Stefan Armbruster
Aleksander, HW is a Thinkpad X1 Yoga equipped with a Sierra ID 1199:9079. System is a Ubuntu 16.04 with ubuntu mainline 4.6.2 kernel. I've built locally debian packages for libmbim, libqmi and modemmanager - each based on qmi-over-mbim branch. I've used the stock version shipping with the distribu

Re: Sierra Wireless EM7455

2016-06-10 Thread Ralph Plawetzki
Am 09.06.2016 um 20:43 schrieb Bjørn Mork: > That should work, but with NAT in your ISPs network. The address is > part of the "Shared Address Space" for carrier grade NAT. See > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6598 Yeah, that's true. I bought an USB UMTS modem stick at the supermarket and with u

Re: [PATCH] Hardening PORTCFG parse reply

2016-06-10 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 14:51 +0200, Carlo Lobrano wrote: > A brief explaination of the issue that this patch solves. > I observed a probing failure at resume from memory (S3), caused by a > missing or wrong reply to #PORTCFG? AT command sent during port > probing. > This error is probably due to the

Re: Sierra Wireless EM7455

2016-06-10 Thread Ralph Plawetzki
Am 09.06.2016 um 18:03 schrieb Ralph Plawetzki: > I see. I am not sure whether it says 'Lenovo' or 'Sierra' on lsusb. Bus 001 Device 006: ID 1199:9079 Sierra Wireless, Inc Ralph ___ ModemManager-devel mailing list ModemManager-devel@lists.freedesktop.or

Re: Sierra Wireless EM7455

2016-06-10 Thread Ralph Plawetzki
Am 09.06.2016 um 20:43 schrieb Bjørn Mork: > intended to work. But maybe not for Internet? Are there other APNs you > can use? Can you verify that the APN you are using works (for Internet > access) on e.g. a phone? No, the APN is right for my provider/contract. The SIM card used to work with t

Re: Sierra Wireless EM7455

2016-06-10 Thread Bjørn Mork
Dan Williams writes: > On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 18:03 +0200, Ralph Plawetzki wrote: > >> I see. I am not sure whether it says 'Lenovo' or 'Sierra' on lsusb. > > Sierra's vendor id is 1199.  If your device (as reported by lsusb) is > not 1199, then it's a OEM-ized device and probably subject to the BI