On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 09:19 +, Colin Helliwell wrote:
> > On 08 March 2017 at 14:38 Aleksander Morgado > .es> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Colin Helliwell
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > But this brings me back (in a
Hey Salvador,
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Penalva, Salvador
wrote:
>
> root@ccimx6ulsbc:~# mmcli -m 0
>
>
>
> /org/freedesktop/ModemManager1/Modem/0 (device id
> '6cb907e9b25fd81d9b144d3346b48cc89f489910')
>
> -
>
> Hardware |
> On 08 March 2017 at 14:38 Aleksander Morgado wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Colin Helliwell
>
> wrote:
>
> > But this brings me back (in a round-the-houses way!) to my original
> > question: when the PPP fails, for
> On 08 March 2017 at 14:08 Colin Helliwell
> wrote:
>
> Firstly the SIM I've mostly been using ['SIM1'] seems to have a problem
> establishing a PPP - it gets through the LCP negotiation but then fails the
> IPCP negotiation.
> Dunno why - it has been working
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Reinhard Speyerer wrote:
>> I'll look for a command which can achieve the same test - perhaps the
>> function could switch over to the alternative if it gets an
>> 'unsupported' error? (My modems give a "+CME ERROR: 22")
>
> Maybe AT^SSET would be