Re: [PATCH 1/2] Inverted steps in update_lock_info_context_step

2016-07-26 Thread Aleksander Morgado
On 13/05/16 17:15, Carlo Lobrano wrote: > Inverted steps UPDATE_LOCK_INFO_CONTEXT_STEP_RETRIES and > UPDATE_LOCK_INFO_CONTEXT_STEP_AFTER_UNLOCK. > > Soon after the unlock, the SIM can be busy and > loading unlock retries might fail. > > When implemented, let run "after unlock" logic before any ot

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Inverted steps in update_lock_info_context_step

2016-07-18 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 16:16 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 16:48 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Carlo Lobrano > > m> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, has

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Inverted steps in update_lock_info_context_step

2016-06-30 Thread Aleksander Morgado
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 16:48 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Carlo Lobrano >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, has this change already merged? >> Not yet; IIRC Dan suggested to merge it after releasing 1.6.0. > > Yeah, I

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Inverted steps in update_lock_info_context_step

2016-06-01 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 16:48 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Carlo Lobrano > wrote: > > > > Hi, has this change already merged? > Not yet; IIRC Dan suggested to merge it after releasing 1.6.0. Yeah, I did suggest that, because I thought it was quite a large (tho

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Inverted steps in update_lock_info_context_step

2016-06-01 Thread Aleksander Morgado
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Carlo Lobrano wrote: > Hi, has this change already merged? Not yet; IIRC Dan suggested to merge it after releasing 1.6.0. I'm targeting to review the QMI over MBIM integration during these next 2 weeks, which is the only thing blocking us to release a 1.6.0. --

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Inverted steps in update_lock_info_context_step

2016-06-01 Thread Carlo Lobrano
Hi, has this change already merged? On Fri, 13 May 2016 at 20:05 Aleksander Morgado wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Carlo Lobrano > wrote: > > Inverted steps UPDATE_LOCK_INFO_CONTEXT_STEP_RETRIES and > > UPDATE_LOCK_INFO_CONTEXT_STEP_AFTER_UNLOCK. > > > > Soon after the unlock, the SI

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Inverted steps in update_lock_info_context_step

2016-05-13 Thread Aleksander Morgado
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Carlo Lobrano wrote: > Inverted steps UPDATE_LOCK_INFO_CONTEXT_STEP_RETRIES and > UPDATE_LOCK_INFO_CONTEXT_STEP_AFTER_UNLOCK. > > Soon after the unlock, the SIM can be busy and > loading unlock retries might fail. > > When implemented, let run "after unlock" logic

[PATCH 1/2] Inverted steps in update_lock_info_context_step

2016-05-13 Thread Carlo Lobrano
Inverted steps UPDATE_LOCK_INFO_CONTEXT_STEP_RETRIES and UPDATE_LOCK_INFO_CONTEXT_STEP_AFTER_UNLOCK. Soon after the unlock, the SIM can be busy and loading unlock retries might fail. When implemented, let run "after unlock" logic before any other step in update lock info, when SIM is not locked t