Hey,
>
> I am in the same situation and my Quectel BG770A-GL modem is using the
> EMUX instead of the standard CMUX mode.
>
> Quectel is only providing full PPP support for this EMUX mode and so
> would like to know what could be
> the best way to add support for thoses /dev/pts virtual devices
Hello,
I am in the same situation and my Quectel BG770A-GL modem is using the
EMUX instead of the standard CMUX mode.
Quectel is only providing full PPP support for this EMUX mode and so
would like to know what could be
the best way to add support for thoses /dev/pts virtual devices in MM
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 11:28 AM Garfield Watkins
wrote:
>
> Is there any other workaround you can suggest ? I really do need these
> virtual terminals exposed by the multiplexer.
>
Without adjusting MM to support the specific use case of the ptys, I'm
not sure there is any easy way to handle
Is there any other workaround you can suggest ? I really do need these
virtual terminals exposed by the multiplexer.
On 4/9/24 11:24, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
Hey
No unfortunately they are not. They (the psuedo terminals) are created by
opening /dev/ptmx which creates a terminal(s) in
Hey
>
> No unfortunately they are not. They (the psuedo terminals) are created by
> opening /dev/ptmx which creates a terminal(s) in /dev/pts/ . These are not
> enumerated in any way. Oh well... let me try your suggestion and see if it
> works.
>
If the ptys don't have an entry in sysfs, not
No unfortunately they are not. They (the psuedo terminals) are created
by opening /dev/ptmx which creates a terminal(s) in /dev/pts/ . These
are not enumerated in any way. Oh well... let me try your suggestion and
see if it works.
On 4/9/24 11:05, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:43 PM Garfield Watkins
wrote:
>
> Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a way for to write a udev rule against
> a pseudo terminal...
>
Are they not notified via udev really?
You could also try to set it up with ModemManager not running with
udev support
Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a way for to write a udev rule
against a pseudo terminal...
On 3/8/24 11:31, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
Hey Garfield,
I have a situation where I have a ublox modem, the LISA u200, wired up using
its SPI bus as the communication channel. On the DTE side
Hey Garfield,
> I have a situation where I have a ublox modem, the LISA u200, wired up using
> its SPI bus as the communication channel. On the DTE side is a raspberry pi
> SBC with a custom spi platform driver that exposes a tty device for modem.
> This driver is not capable of multiplexing
Hi
I have a situation where I have a ublox modem, the LISA u200, wired up
using its SPI bus as the communication channel. On the DTE side is a
raspberry pi SBC with a custom spi platform driver that exposes a tty
device for modem. This driver is not capable of multiplexing and
exposing
10 matches
Mail list logo
