On 22/02/18 17:55, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Releasing the port on the device looks benign but because it emits
>> a signal, it could call device_context_port_released and unref the
>> MMDevice in port_context_unref. This means the MMDevice might be
>> disposed before we get to the g_object_ref and
On 21/02/18 22:49, Eric Caruso wrote:
> Releasing the port on the device looks benign but because it emits
> a signal, it could call device_context_port_released and unref the
> MMDevice in port_context_unref. This means the MMDevice might be
> disposed before we get to the g_object_ref and the
On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 13:49 -0800, Eric Caruso wrote:
> Releasing the port on the device looks benign but because it emits
> a signal, it could call device_context_port_released and unref the
> MMDevice in port_context_unref. This means the MMDevice might be
> disposed before we get to the
Releasing the port on the device looks benign but because it emits
a signal, it could call device_context_port_released and unref the
MMDevice in port_context_unref. This means the MMDevice might be
disposed before we get to the g_object_ref and the subsequent call
to g_hash_table_remove will try
