Re: Issues regarding multiple MBIM bearer support

2021-06-21 Thread Bjørn Mork
Aleksander Morgado writes: >> With master (83ac82470589a3672092a0ba0be855093b1cf5e2) I had problems. MM >> did want to enable multiplexing, but it failed for some reason, probably at >> sub-interface creation: >> >> 2021-06-16 10:04:05.630664 +00:00 test-host NetworkManager[457]: >>

Re: Issues regarding multiple MBIM bearer support

2021-06-21 Thread Aleksander Morgado
Hey, > > Just to let you know - I cherry-picked > e5305498b7ddbc5e419cf51fc0c30aa6593a40d2 over 1.16.6 tag, and it did fix the > VLAN issue - new bearers objects appear, but all use session 0. > Without the fix it didn't - the issue was caught exactly on vanilla 1.16.6, > but we didn't gather

Re: Issues regarding multiple MBIM bearer support

2021-06-21 Thread Lech Perczak
rder to go further while waiting for fix on the modem side - I made a > > workaround, which led me to discovery of a few issues regarding multiple > > MBIM bearer support. > > > > Long story short: > > - At time of ModemManager 1.6.x, the modem was establishing con

Re: Issues regarding multiple MBIM bearer support

2021-06-15 Thread Aleksander Morgado
h led me to discovery of a few issues regarding multiple MBIM > bearer support. > > Long story short: > - At time of ModemManager 1.6.x, the modem was establishing connection > properly most of the time - it was hard to reproduce the connection problem > at all > - With Mode

Issues regarding multiple MBIM bearer support

2021-06-15 Thread Lech Perczak
regarding multiple MBIM bearer support. Long story short: - At time of ModemManager 1.6.x, the modem was establishing connection properly most of the time - it was hard to reproduce the connection problem at all - With ModemManager 1.16.x, the modem would sometimes fail at "packet service a