matthew stanger writes:
>>
>> Forgot to comment on this. They use a SIMCom SIM7100E or SIM7100A WWAN
>> module according to
>> https://developer.puri.sm/Librem5/Hardware_Reference.html
>
> Oh that's new, they where going to use the PLS8 with PCIe. That's what got
> my attention.
That's also a
>
> Forgot to comment on this. They use a SIMCom SIM7100E or SIM7100A WWAN
> module according to
> https://developer.puri.sm/Librem5/Hardware_Reference.html
Oh that's new, they where going to use the PLS8 with PCIe. That's what got
my attention.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:04 AM Bjørn Mork
matthew stanger writes:
> I thought
> the (Librem 5 Linux Phone) ( https://puri.sm/products/librem-5/ ) was
> already using MM with PCIe? I know that's their plan.
Forgot to comment on this. They use a SIMCom SIM7100E or SIM7100A WWAN
module according to
matthew stanger writes:
> Is this thread implying the MM doesn't support PCIe in general?
No. Only that kernel drivers are required.
The situation for USB devices is good because there are only a few
host<->device protocols in use, and those protocols are well known by
now. We even have a
Is this thread implying the MM doesn't support PCIe in general? I thought
the (Librem 5 Linux Phone) ( https://puri.sm/products/librem-5/ ) was
already using MM with PCIe? I know that's their plan.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 4:01 AM Bjørn Mork wrote:
> 王道之 writes:
>
> > Intel have the plan to
王道之 writes:
> Intel have the plan to opensource the PCIe driver. I would put it here
> once the Intel opensource it.
Looking forward to that!
Bjørn
___
ModemManager-devel mailing list
ModemManager-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Intel have the plan to opensource the PCIe driver. I would put it here
once the Intel opensource it.
But the driver do not offer a cdc_mbim port, just offer AT port. In MM, it
would manage with the base modem. And the VLAN ID map is defined by Intel,
so I do not think the driver could be use in
Now you made me really curious. That sounds a lot like the cdc_mbim userspace
ABI. And I didn't expect anyone to copy that since I don't think anyone is
happy with it. Including me.
Or are they simply creating a usb mbim device? That would make sense. But then
it should have worked with mm, so
Hey
The Intel offer a PCIe device driver to suit my situation. The driver could
grab a virtual net port from the PCIe modem, then the user like me could
use VLAN to divide the virtual net port in several VLAN ports, the VLAN
port can be mapped by socat as AT port and trace port. The map is defined
Daniele Palmas writes:
> Il giorno lun 10 dic 2018 alle ore 14:25 Bjørn Mork ha
> scritto:
>>
>> As for Qualcomm based modems: Haven't yet seen any docs for the PCIe
>> interface there either. So I'll assume it is similar to the Intel one.
>
> related to Qualcomm I guess this development
>
>
Hi Bjørn,
Il giorno lun 10 dic 2018 alle ore 14:25 Bjørn Mork ha scritto:
>
> As for Qualcomm based modems: Haven't yet seen any docs for the PCIe
> interface there either. So I'll assume it is similar to the Intel one.
related to Qualcomm I guess this development
I believe we would be best off with a "fake" USB MBIM device, like the
Windows driver creates. This would ensure immediate support in
ModemManager, as well as other Linux userspace implementations (oFono,
umbim etc).
There is already an NCM gadget in the kernel. Creating a basic MBIM
gadget
Yes, as Ben said the PCIe on L860 seems going backward. But on the
laptop side, when the laptop use L850, the latpop would use PCIe when the
OS is Windows, but the laptop would use MBIM when the OS is Unix. In this
reason, the laptop vendor want to use PCIe no matter the OS is.
And once
I wonder why MBIM-enumerated-over-PCIe (L860) is preferred over
MBIM-over-USB3 (L850). Perhaps the theoretical achievable data rate
over PCIe?
Despite the MBIM enumeration, having a vendor specific host interface
does feel going backward as Bjørn said. IMHO, the industry should
really move
Hey Aleksander
The device is basic on the Intel 7560 chip, or L860 in fibocom that
difference the L850 with PCIe in MBIM protocol.
I am not sure there need a PCIe lib or yet, as now I can use lspci
found the device, and there is a net port with the drive offered by Intel.
And the drive
王道之 writes:
> By the way, I found the comment Nozomi, Card-Bus PCI (not USB) at the
> device "Option GT 3G+ EMEA" in the supported devices list , Is that mean
> the device use the PCI protocol? If in that way, I can refer to when I
> develop.
Don't know anything about this card. But
Hey,
> I am going to add a PCIe not in USB protocol modem device in the
> Modemmanager. In order to better integrate into the current architecture of
> Modemmanager, any development advice?
> As I planned, I am going to add the new PCIe device in the plugins
> folder,but I am not sure
Hey all
I am going to add a PCIe not in USB protocol modem device in the
Modemmanager. In order to better integrate into the current architecture of
Modemmanager, any development advice?
As I planned, I am going to add the new PCIe device in
the plugins folder,but I am not sure where to
18 matches
Mail list logo
