No unfortunately they are not. They (the psuedo terminals) are created
by opening /dev/ptmx which creates a terminal(s) in /dev/pts/ . These
are not enumerated in any way. Oh well... let me try your suggestion and
see if it works.
On 4/9/24 11:05, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2,
Hey!
>
> I completely understand why there may be concerns at editing such critical
> code for a use case that is not very common.
>
> Unfortunately my current situation requires renaming the interfaces. Multiple
> modems may take turns being 'selected' (having the interface renamed) to pass
>
Hey!
>
> First of all I wanted to say thanks for developing and supporting a great
> piece of software.
>
Thanks to you for using it!
> We have a few thousand devices running ModemManager 1.18.6 and Quectel EC21
> modem. Our service provider Twilio/Kore keeps reporting that on some devices
>
Is there any other workaround you can suggest ? I really do need these
virtual terminals exposed by the multiplexer.
On 4/9/24 11:24, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
Hey
No unfortunately they are not. They (the psuedo terminals) are created by
opening /dev/ptmx which creates a terminal(s) in
Hey Radu,
>
> I attached 1 OK log (ModemManager-1.23.4-ok.log - git
> 6a8797927c1ef9df1f56513b742f01de86f5167f), and one not ok log
> (ModemManager-1.23.5-nok.log git 6388b583c7b9c25d3061a070f54f9d97d59e2b2c).
>
> Please let me know if I can be of any help.
> Radu
>
I looked at the two logs
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:43 PM Garfield Watkins
wrote:
>
> Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a way for to write a udev rule against
> a pseudo terminal...
>
Are they not notified via udev really?
You could also try to set it up with ModemManager not running with
udev support
Hey
>
> No unfortunately they are not. They (the psuedo terminals) are created by
> opening /dev/ptmx which creates a terminal(s) in /dev/pts/ . These are not
> enumerated in any way. Oh well... let me try your suggestion and see if it
> works.
>
If the ptys don't have an entry in sysfs, not
