Hi Florian,
you should announce it on all affected mls. Otherwise there would be
some confusion that a mail didn't reach the mailing list.
--
Grüße
k-j
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to moderators+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems?
Hi,
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-11-21 01:01:
After two times sleeping about it, I decided to bring this up at
disc...@documentfoundation.org. I want to see, whether there are more
people who support kind of general comunication style agreement, where
better to use Netiquette is a first
Hi Florian, *,
Am 21.11.2011 09:05 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-11-21 01:01:
I want to see, whether there are more people who support kind of
general comunication style agreement, where better to use Netiquette
is a first step as well as switching off
Hi Florian, *,
Am 18.11.2011 05:58 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-11-18 01:36:
[..]
So from my point of view it's easy: just take the task from your desk,
and wait for my ping. No ping - mangling kept, blame me! ;o))
Honestly, I'd like to get this done
Hi,
Florian Effenberger wrote on 2011-10-29 13:23:
- We'll test it out on a general list like discuss@ to see the results.
- I will do that change as soon as you ping me that you have the posting
guidelines rewritten.
any progress on this already?
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger
Hi Florian, *,
Am 27.10.2011 11:54 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
Right now, we interfere with Reply-to in two ways:
1. We remove any existing reply-to set by the poster.
2. We add a reply-to list.
In a nutshell: Reply-to is always to the list.
My proposal would have been to always set a
Sorry, everybody, I've tried to follow this thread, but I fear that some
messages at an early stage got lost. (I think I've now found most of them in
the archives, but it didn't help a lot!)
I gather it revolves around changing the Reply-to field.
Can someone tell me what currently happens to
Hi James,
James Wilde wrote on 2011-10-27 09:11:
Can someone tell me what currently happens to the Reply-to field, what the
options under discussion are, and what will happen to the discuss list after
the change?
if we don't do any reply-to-mangling at all, there are three scenarios:
a.
Hi Florian, *,
Am 24.10.2011 23:13 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-10-23 20:44:
My vote:
leave user added reply-to alone, don't set reply-to $list.
to my experience, that's the solution that will break most lists, as
most clients simply reply to the original
Hi Florian, *,
Am 23.10.2011 16:51 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-10-20 23:25:
[..]
I nevertheless support to do that change due to the above stated risk.
the question is, what exactly do we want to have. Shall I simply
disabling the removal of user-added
Hi,
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-10-20 23:25:
I nevertheless support to do that change due to the above stated risk.
the question is, what exactly do we want to have. Shall I simply
disabling the removal of user-added reply-to headers, or shall I also
disable the addition of reply-to:
11 matches
Mail list logo
