Hi, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-10-20 23:25:
I nevertheless support to do that change due to the above stated risk.
the question is, what exactly do we want to have. Shall I simply disabling the removal of user-added reply-to headers, or shall I also disable the addition of reply-to: list?
For scenario 1, if mlmmj does what it is supposed to, the default reply-to header would be set to the list, but any user-created reply-to header would be *added* to that, i.e. does not get lost like it does not.
Florian -- Florian Effenberger <flo...@documentfoundation.org> Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to moderators+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
