Re: Apache::Request->new() problem

2000-10-21 Thread Maurizio Cimaschi
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 01:06:33PM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: > mod_perl wasn't built with EVERYTHING=1 (I'm not sure whether > libapreq needs PERL_TABLE_API=1 or not) In fact I needed to rebuild mod_perl with this enabled in order to have Apache::Request works properly. -- Ciao, Mauriz

Re: A question on Macs

2000-10-21 Thread Dana C. Chandler III
Hi John, The MAC OS's range from 8.1 - 8.6. The main problem before we turned keepalive off was that the applications took much longer to load than the PC, in many cases we're talking minutes not seconds. And then depending on the Browser there are numerous other problems. For instance, we use

Re: simple cookie authorization?

2000-10-21 Thread Rodney Broom
From: "Jason Bodnar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> JB> Is there a module for simple cookie authorization? I want to grant access if JB> the user has a cookie set. I don't care about the value of the cookie. Sounds like you just need vanilla cookie access. Have a look at: http://search.cpan.org/doc/LDS/C

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-21 Thread Gunther Birznieks
I believe Greg is familiar with Apache::Session. There have been discussions about this before. A session manager manages the workflow around sessions. A session stores information. They are two different things. In addition, I believe the name session manager has come up on this list before w

Re: simple cookie authorization?

2000-10-21 Thread Jason Bodnar
On 21-Oct-2000 James G Smith wrote: > Jason Bodnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Is there a module for simple cookie authorization? I want to grant access if >>the user has a cookie set. I don't care about the value of the cookie. >> >>I looked at Apache::AuthCookie and it looks overly complex for

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-21 Thread James G Smith
Check out Apache::Session, available on CPAN and see if your code could be moulded to fit it's way of thinking. If they are too much different, then you might want to consider contacting the module list to see if what you have is a good name (it probably is) before going all out with distribution

Re: simple cookie authorization?

2000-10-21 Thread James G Smith
Jason Bodnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is there a module for simple cookie authorization? I want to grant access if >the user has a cookie set. I don't care about the value of the cookie. > >I looked at Apache::AuthCookie and it looks overly complex for my needs. Something like the following?

simple cookie authorization?

2000-10-21 Thread Jason Bodnar
Is there a module for simple cookie authorization? I want to grant access if the user has a cookie set. I don't care about the value of the cookie. I looked at Apache::AuthCookie and it looks overly complex for my needs. -- Jason Bodnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Building on MacOS X (Darwin)?

2000-10-21 Thread Ken Williams
Hi all, I figured I'd try to build mod_perl on MacOS X Public Beta (Darwin), and ran into a couple of snags. Thought I'd check whether others have had success. I haven't yet tried recompiling Perl from source, so that's probably the next step. During 'perl Makefile.PL' I get lots of errors fro

Re: Apache trouble reading in large cookie contents

2000-10-21 Thread ___cliff rayman___
Gunther Birznieks wrote: > Caveat: even if you modify apache to do larger cookies, it's possible that > there will be a set of browsers that won't support it. true. i believe the original poster said that this was for an internal environment where browser choice can be controlled. that said,

Re: File Space Usage ... in perl ?

2000-10-21 Thread Christian Jaeger
See http://testwww.ethz.ch/source/my_scripts_collection/duu for a script of mine calculating directory sizes (it's like du but more eye friendly, it displays the subfolders sorted after their size). Its not the same thing, as it uses du to calculate the size of each subfolder, but I've had the

Re: @INC and use

2000-10-21 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On 20 Oct 2000, Stephen A. Cochran wrote: > I've been porting a CGI to mod_perl, and had it working. Then last night > mod_perl and apache were upgraded and recompiled and it stopped working. :( > From the mod_perl guide: > (http://perl.apache.org/guide/porting.html#Reloading_Module

Re: How to use gcc to build mod_perl

2000-10-21 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi all, On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Rob Tanner wrote: > BEWARE: The modperl build picks up the CC variable value from the perl > build. I don't know whether that was done simply as a matter of > convenience (i.e., the perl build process thoroughly tested the > compiler for the required capabilities

Re: File Space Usage ... in perl ?

2000-10-21 Thread Ernest Lergon
Dear Fred, without testing it, just some ideas. Try to exchange: To be on the safe side: > my $_size = -s $File::Find::name; my $_size = -s $File::Find::fullname; To count links in: > find ( $wanted, "$dir" ); find ( { wanted => $wanted, follow => 1 }, $dir ); Che

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-21 Thread Greg Cope
Greg Cope wrote: > > Dear ALL > > I've writen a module that does transparent session management via either > Cookies, Munged URI or Query Args. > > It has quite a few options to change the behavour, and appears stable in > my developement environment. > > What I suggest is that unless there is

File Space Usage ... in perl ?

2000-10-21 Thread Frédéric Schwien
Hi,   I'm wondering if there is a way to get exactly the same result of system fonction "du" in Perl.   I need to know the disk Space tooken by a directory and it's sub-directory. To do that, I used the find method in File::Find to get the size (using -s file test) of each file and dir in a d

Re: IPC::Shareable (was Re: Perl module - LWP)

2000-10-21 Thread Greg Cope
"Alexander Farber (EED)" wrote: > > "David M. Davisson" wrote: > > Yes, it works fine. No mods. > > > From: "David Jourard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Has anyone worked with the LWP module under mod_perl and have they found > > > that it works with no modification. > > I would like to ask the s

IPC::Shareable (was Re: Perl module - LWP)

2000-10-21 Thread Alexander Farber (EED)
"David M. Davisson" wrote: > Yes, it works fine. No mods. > From: "David Jourard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Has anyone worked with the LWP module under mod_perl and have they found > > that it works with no modification. I would like to ask the same question about IPC::Shareable. Is anybody succ