Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
> > Can I ask why you are not useing IPC::Sharedlight (as its pure C and
> > apparently much faster than IPC::Shareable - I've never benchmarked it
> > as I've also used IPC::Sharedlight).
>
> Full circle back to the original topic...
> IPC::MM is implemented in C and off
> Can I ask why you are not useing IPC::Sharedlight (as its pure C and
> apparently much faster than IPC::Shareable - I've never benchmarked it
> as I've also used IPC::Sharedlight).
Full circle back to the original topic...
IPC::MM is implemented in C and offers an actual hash interface backed b
DeWitt Clinton wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 03:33:12PM +0100, Christian Jaeger wrote:
>
> > I've looked at Cache::FileCache now and think it's (currently) not
> > possible to use for IPC::FsSharevars:
> >
> > I really miss locking capabilities. Imagine a script that reads a
> > value at th
> I'm very intrigued by your thinking on locking. I had never
> considered the transaction based approach to caching you are referring
> to. I'll take this up privately with you, because we've strayed far
> off the mod_perl topic, although I find it fascinating.
One more suggestion before you t
Hi, Gunther!
>Although SOAP::Lite interfaces with SMTP and POP3, I don't know if
>SOAP::Lite really qualifies to be in the same class as products like
>JMS, Neon, or Microsoft MSMQ.
I think not or at least not yet :).
>However, I think the description of what the author is interested in
>is a
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 03:33:12PM +0100, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> I've looked at Cache::FileCache now and think it's (currently) not
> possible to use for IPC::FsSharevars:
>
> I really miss locking capabilities. Imagine a script that reads a
> value at the beginning of a request and writes
At 22:23 Uhr -0500 10.3.2001, DeWitt Clinton wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 04:35:02PM -0800, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > Christian Jaeger wrote:
>> > Yes, it uses a separate file for each variable. This way also locking
>> > is solved, each variable has it's own file lock.
>>
>> You should tak
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Richard Chen wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 12:41:25PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Richard Chen wrote:
> >
> > > This is pretty weird situation. I have installed a signal
> > > handler in startup.pl which showed that the signal is
> > > delivered to a
