Re: Problems with PerlModule

2002-06-22 Thread Stas Bekman
Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Hallo! > > Is it possible that PerlModule doesn't modify %INC? > > With PerlModule CGI in the Apache configuration, all scripts with "use > CGI" produce warnings like: > > Subroutine put redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/CGI.pm line 517. > Subroutine print redefined at /u

Re: Fascinating segfault at Apache startup

2002-06-22 Thread Chip Turner
"Zac Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Honestly though Chip I have to pipe up here. > > I was a gung ho RedHat supporter when I first got involved in the > linux world, and I still believe with it's RPMs and GUI tools it's > still the best for both new users and corporate environments, but >

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI 0.89)

2002-06-22 Thread Charles Aulds
At 06:41 PM 6/21/02 +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will need to: >>1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas said, >>   Apache::DBI can only work with that one) >>2) You will probably need to

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI 0.89)

2002-06-22 Thread Charles Aulds
At 06:41 PM 6/21/02 +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will need to: 1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas said, Apache::DBI can only work with that one) 2) You will probably need to run mod_per

Problems with PerlModule

2002-06-22 Thread Nikolaus Rath
Hallo! Is it possible that PerlModule doesn't modify %INC? With PerlModule CGI in the Apache configuration, all scripts with "use CGI" produce warnings like: Subroutine put redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/CGI.pm line 517. Subroutine print redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/CGI.pm line 523. Sub

Re: [JOB] Red Hat Web Engineer Wanted

2002-06-22 Thread Casey West
It was Thursday, June 20, 2002 when Tom Lancaster took the soap box, saying: : Hello all, : : we're looking for a Web Engineer to fill out the team working on redhat.com. : Please read the formal description below. The emphasis will be on Perl and mod_perl. : Familiarity with templating systems,

Re: [apache-ssl] Porblems marrying Apache 1.3.26, pache-ssl 1.48and mod_perl 1.27

2002-06-22 Thread Ben Laurie
The Doctor wrote: > It has been a long time since what I have described happened. ... > /tmp: Permission denied > > assertion "0" failed: file "apache_ssl.c", line 1616 This is gcache failing to start (mental note: must make diagnostic more informative). The line before is perror(cmd), so it lo

OT Job discussion, was Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-22 Thread Tom Mornini
On Saturday, June 22, 2002, at 02:46 AM, Ged Haywood wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Zac Morris wrote: > >> Old fashioned is right, > > Can we decide whether this kind of post is or is not welcome on the > List? For what it's worth, my inclusion of the list address on my reply was entirely accid

Re: Fascinating segfault at Apache startup

2002-06-22 Thread Jeremy Weatherford
Come to think of it, this is exactly what I did on my RedHat 7.2 system -- grabbed a Perl 5.6.1 RPM without noticing that it was for RedHat 7.3. It installed fine, and Perl worked okay, so why not? Thanks for straightening this up, Eric -- as Chip said, everything should have worked fine with th

RE: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-22 Thread stevea
>> Old fashioned is right, > Can we decide whether this kind of post is or is not welcome on the List? Hang on Ged, I'm thinking that there might be a community opportunity to develop a library of tools that will solve the obvious problem here. Would it be possible to provide a solution for vis

Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-22 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 11:46 22.06.2002, Ged Haywood wrote: >Hi all, > >On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Zac Morris wrote: > > > Old fashioned is right, > >Can we decide whether this kind of post is or is not welcome on the List? > >My 0.02 is that if someone has decided on the terms of reference for >an offer of employment whic

Re: apache 1.3.24 mod_perl 1.27 perl 5.6.1 segv

2002-06-22 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, John Saylor wrote: > Try as I might, I cannot get apache to run. It just keeps segv-ing. Did you compile everything yourself? Did you see the document in mod_perl-1.27/SUPPORT ? 73, Ged.

Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-22 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi all, On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Zac Morris wrote: > Old fashioned is right, Can we decide whether this kind of post is or is not welcome on the List? My 0.02 is that if someone has decided on the terms of reference for an offer of employment which he is making then if it's legal, that's the way i

Re: perl xml api's

2002-06-22 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi guys, On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > thanks matt, i'll get it(XML::LibXML) andgiveit a go. The subject line for this message was missing the RE: tag. Just a reminder to anyone new to the List that there are packages (and people:) which (who) might be confused by this... 73,