Image Problem

2002-09-23 Thread AdItYa
I'm compiling and installing apache-1.3.26 with mod_perl 1.27 , It's normal without error. I'm using httpd -l then mod_perl is in the list. Then I starting Apache, and run Test Page, but the image/icons cannot display just x (unknown.gif). I'm using standard httpd.conf from instalation, without

Re: performance regarding mod_perl vs mod_c with embedded perl

2002-09-23 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Peter Bi wrote: > The linked page is great, especially the first picture. > > Problem in authentication: if mod_perl returns cached header and > the document is proxy cached in the plain Apache, the backend > authentication handler (in the mod_perl server) will not be able >

Re: Confused

2002-09-23 Thread Rich DeSimone
I have no idea why but it works all of a sudden. I didn't do one thing. How strange is thatthanks for your help guys I did learn some stuff. Rich - Original Message - From: "John Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Rich DeSimone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunda

Re: Confused

2002-09-23 Thread John Simpson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 22 September 2002 10:33, Rich DeSimone wrote: > [Sat Sep 21 18:21:08 2002] [error] [client 10.0.0.2] Can't locate > loadable object for module DBI in @INC (@INC contains: > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i686-linux > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0 >

Re: Apache::Session and user sessions

2002-09-23 Thread Todd W
> >It's just a storage mechanism. Typically the procedure is that one a user >identified herself with some kind of login process, you put her user ID (a >primary key to a database table) into the session, and keep it as a key for >accessing that data. > >>I have a table with some basic user in

[DIGEST] mod_perl digest 2002/09/09

2002-09-23 Thread jgsmith
-- mod_perl digest September 9, 2002 - September 22, 2002 -- Recent happenings in the mod_perl world... Features

Re: same module with different pragmas

2002-09-23 Thread Rick Myers
On Sep 23, 2002 at 17:05:07 -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In the sets of applications that runs under mod_perl on our webserver > > we need the same modules twice, but with different pragmas. > > > > app1: use module qw(standard pragma1); > > app2: use module qw(st

RE: same module with different pragmas

2002-09-23 Thread Andrew G. Hammond
undef the module's namespace from main:: when you're done using it. this should cause it to be reloaded every time. -Original Message- From: Perrin Harkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 5:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: same mo

Re: same module with different pragmas

2002-09-23 Thread Perrin Harkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In the sets of applications that runs under mod_perl on our webserver > we need the same modules twice, but with different pragmas. > > app1: use module qw(standard pragma1); > app2: use module qw(standard pragma2); > > now, of course - whichever application is neede

Apache::Util::parsedate make test error

2002-09-23 Thread Andreas Hasenack
apache-2.0.41-dev (prefork) mod_perl-1.99_05 perl-5.6.1 I'm getting the following error in Apache::Util::parsedate from the compat/apache_util.t test suite: (...) # testing : Apache::Util::ht_time # expected: 'Seg, 23 Set 2002 20:37:30 GMT' # received: 'Seg, 23 Set 2002 20:37:30 GMT' ok 12 # tes

same module with different pragmas

2002-09-23 Thread pilsl
Today I finally resolved a strange error that was bugging me for days now. In the sets of applications that runs under mod_perl on our webserver we need the same modules twice, but with different pragmas. app1: use module qw(standard pragma1); app2: use module qw(standard pragma2); now, of co

DBD::Informix on SCO 5.0.6.

2002-09-23 Thread Ganesan M
Hi, Does anyone installed DBD::Informix on SCO? I am getting the following error. ld: ERROR: Illegal option -- g I kinda figured out what is causing the problem. But I don't know the solution. Does anyone has any solution for the problem? I found the following in Makefile. # -G option

Re: performance regarding mod_perl vs mod_c with embedded perl

2002-09-23 Thread Vivek Khera
> "PB" == Peter Bi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: PB> The linked page is great, especially the first picture. PB> Problem in authentication: if mod_perl returns cached header and the PB> document is proxy cached in the plain Apache, the backend authentication PB> handler (in the mod_perl server

Re: BUG: Apache::Cookie v1.0

2002-09-23 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Monday, 2002-09-23 at 11:11:02 -0400, darren chamberlain wrote: > * Michael McLagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-21 11:45]: > > There is a bug in Apache::Cookie. It doesn't handle a cookie with > > zero bytes in it! > This is because Apache::Cookie is implemented in C, and C uses NULL as > th

Re: Confused

2002-09-23 Thread Josef
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:33:36AM -0400, Rich DeSimone wrote: > Hi I am just messing around with Perl DBI/Apache and I can't seem to understand this >problem. Right now I am just trying to write a simple CGI perl script that just >displays a mysql query. I am using this code... > > #!/usr/bi

Re: top for apache? [OT]

2002-09-23 Thread Eric Cholet
--On Sunday, September 22, 2002 09:54:02 -0400 Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nigel Hamilton wrote: >> It would be great to have a similar tool for mod_perl/apache. > > The closest thing available is a combination of mod_status and > Apache::Status. If you haven't tried thes

Re: top for apache? [OT]

2002-09-23 Thread darren chamberlain
* Nigel Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-21 04:31]: > I just found a really cool tool (mentioned in SysAdmin journal). > It shows a dynamic picture of MySQL processes just like 'top' [-- snip --] > It would be great to have a similar tool for mod_perl/apache. You > could see the memory con

Re: BUG: Apache::Cookie v1.0

2002-09-23 Thread darren chamberlain
* Michael McLagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-21 11:45]: > There is a bug in Apache::Cookie. It doesn't handle a cookie with > zero bytes in it! This is because Apache::Cookie is implemented in C, and C uses NULL as the end of string terminator. This is probably something that needs to be done