RE: SOAP::Lite in mod_perl...

2003-08-29 Thread Greg_Cope
On an unrelated note SOAP::Lite developement seems to have gone quite to me anyway. Greg -- Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Hello World Benchmarks v1.02

2003-03-06 Thread Greg_Cope
> From: Gerald Richter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Yes, Embperl per default caches a "compiled" version of the > stylsheet in > memory. > > Gerald > > P.S. There are also options to cache the result of the xslt > transformation > or any itermediate steps > Oh - A way of making it even faste

RE: Perl Cookbook modperl chapter

2002-12-11 Thread Greg_Cope
> From: Nathan Torkington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 11 December 2002 20:58 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Perl Cookbook modperl chapter > > > I also need help on content. I'm not competing with Geoff, Randy, and > Paul's excellent book (mod_perl Developer's Cookbook)--they have 630

RE: possible buget in CGI.pm

2002-07-24 Thread Greg_Cope
> From: mike808 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24 July 2002 05:54 > To: Lincoln Stein; Cope, Greg; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: possible buget in CGI.pm > > Lincoln, Greg, mod_perl list: > > The problem appears to be that the -no_xhtml option is only > processed in > _setup_symbols. This

RE: possible buget in CGI.pm

2002-07-23 Thread Greg_Cope
> -Original Message- > From: darren chamberlain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Can someone confirm this? > > Yes: > Good I'm not mad :-) > From CGI.pm, version 2.81: > > 35 # > Here are some globals that you might want to > adjust << > 36 sub initialize_globals {

possible buget in CGI.pm

2002-07-23 Thread Greg_Cope
Hi All, We are implementing mod_perl here for internal intranet use. We have discovered a possible buglet in CGI.pm. We do not want CGI.pm to return XHTML as it upsets Verity indexing (long story). So in Apache::Registry executed scripts we use: use CGI qw( -no_xhtml ); But on the fi

RE: separating C from V in MVC

2002-05-31 Thread Greg_Cope
> From: Jeff AA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Hiya, my 2 pence worth: > status] this seems to indicate the Model accepts method calls and > returns > data that will be rendered elsewhere. In our planned > development, there > is a LOT of tabular data - do you use any standards for the > data bei

RE: mod perl fails test on my Solaris 2.8 .. ?

2001-11-26 Thread Greg_Cope
> -Original Message- > From: Ged Haywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Have you checked the mod_perl list archive on this one? > Whops, looked in the Guide, but forgot about the archives. I've found the answer in: http://mathforum.org/epigone/modperl/sehpholzhex/3B82C845.CA1C5818@spam

mod perl fails test on my Solaris 2.8 .. ?

2001-11-23 Thread Greg_Cope
Dear All, I've been tasked with setting up a mod_perl apache. I've complied my own perl etc ... in my own home dir, as I need to test our code against it, before passing it off to the addmins for pkg'ing and rolling out to other servers. perl + modules pass all tests. mod_perl appears to buil