I am considering using either HTML::Mason or Apache::Registry for my CGI scripts, but am not sure which is faster. Would the template/pages be cached like the scripts are in Registry? Which would be faster? Obviously using Mason would make cleaner code, but it wouldn't get compiled, would it? Any help you can give is appreciated. Thanks, mckhendry __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com/
- Re: Mason vs. Apache::Registry Kelly White
- Re: Mason vs. Apache::Registry Ken Williams
- Re: Mason vs. Apache::Registry Joshua Chamas