BUG [in docs] semicolon-separated param pairs fail w/ MSIE in metaredirect tags

2003-04-03 Thread m-list-subscribe-modperl-digest
Stas wrote: Matthew, can you please repost it to the mod_perl list? There are many more people who can followup on this. Thanks. I won't be subscribed long enough to read any replies to this mesg, but am posting here at Stas' suggestion. Hopefully someone here will be able to update the docs

tt2 using mason tags

2002-04-08 Thread Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN)
? Part two would be to replace the inline code with tt2 directives- thought it was worth mentioning this before getting flamed. :) I'm just after evaluation with mason tags. Anyone? TIA, fiq

Re: tt2 using mason tags

2002-04-08 Thread Mark Fowler
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN) wrote: Converting Mason to TT2 stuff Hi. May I suggest you repost this to the template toolkit list? http://www.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates Sounds like you're getting confused between [% %] for template code and [% PERL %] ... [%

Re: tt2 using mason tags

2002-04-08 Thread Perrin Harkins
Mark Fowler wrote: Sounds like you're getting confused between [% %] for template code and [% PERL %] ... [% END %] for actual real perl code Agreed. Also, any significant Mason component is likely to use Mason's built-in object model, which is not part of TT. You will probably have to

Re: tt2 using mason tags

2002-04-08 Thread Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN)
based than it is custom mason. Other than the fact that it gets rendered by mason, it is pretty independent. It's just the fact that in spite of my specifying that it should use inline_perl, it didn't interpolate the inline code which uses custom modules in mason tags. I've got it to try

Re: tt2 using mason tags

2002-04-08 Thread Perrin Harkins
Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN) wrote: It's just the fact that in spite of my specifying that it should use inline_perl, it didn't interpolate the inline code which uses custom modules in mason tags. I've got it to try and interpolate now, however it seems to warn that $VARNAME's are odd symbols

META tags added as HTTP headers

2002-01-18 Thread Markus Wichitill
Hi, which part of an Apache/mod_perl setup is responsible for extracting META tags from generated HTML and adding them as HTTP headers (even with PerlSendHeaders Off)? In the case of META NAME='Blah' tags, it adds X-Meta-Blah headers, which are harmless but probably mostly a waste of bandwidth

Re: META tags added as HTTP headers

2002-01-18 Thread Bill Moseley
At 01:20 AM 01/19/02 +0100, Markus Wichitill wrote: which part of an Apache/mod_perl setup is responsible for extracting META tags from generated HTML and adding them as HTTP headers (even with PerlSendHeaders Off)? That's lwp doing that, not Apache or mod_perl. HEAD http://www.apache.org 200

Re: META tags added as HTTP headers

2002-01-18 Thread ___cliff rayman___
, Markus Wichitill wrote: which part of an Apache/mod_perl setup is responsible for extracting META tags from generated HTML and adding them as HTTP headers (even with PerlSendHeaders Off)? That's lwp doing that, not Apache or mod_perl. HEAD http://www.apache.org 200 OK Cache-Control: max-age

Re: META tags added as HTTP headers

2002-01-18 Thread Bill Moseley
At 04:46 PM 01/18/02 -0800, ___cliff rayman___ wrote: hmmm - you are still using lwp. Right. But lwp-request sends a GET request where HEAD sends, well, a HEAD request. So, even though LWP's default is to parse the head section, there's no content to parse in a HEAD request, and thus the meta

: tags

2000-04-24 Thread Dennis
Hey Have anybody heard of :''some perl code'' or : ''some perl code'' tags? If so, what module is responsible for handling those ? I think it looks something like SSI, but SSI has different style of tags and SSI didn't work with those. or maybe it's a different SSI. Do you

RE: Embperl 1.2.0: Problems with OPTION tags

1999-12-31 Thread Gerald Richter
Here's a gdb stacktrace. I compiled embperl with -g (but not the perl executable). Looks like you forgot to link with debug infos (see http://perl.apache.org/embperl/Faq.pod.1.html#How_do_I_build_Embperl_with_de bu ) I had to set heuristic-fence-post to a large value and run the trace

RE: Embperl 1.2.0: Problems with OPTION tags

1999-12-29 Thread Gerald Richter
I'm having problems with Embperl 1.2.0. It core dumps when calling Execute() with $fdat and $ffld params on input files with OPTION tags that contain value params , eg. OPTION VALUE="val". Embperl 1.2b4 has no problem with it though. There where serveral changes in the optio

Re: Embperl 1.2.0: Problems with OPTION tags

1999-12-29 Thread David Waldo
with $fdat and $ffld params on input files with OPTION tags that contain value params , eg. OPTION VALUE="val". Embperl 1.2b4 has no problem with it though. There where serveral changes in the option handling since 1.2b4. I am not aware of a problem there, but I have fixed problems

Re: Embperl 1.2.0: Problems with OPTION tags

1999-12-29 Thread Gerald Richter
I got embperl_19991229171455_tar from CVS but still have the same problem. Make test also fails on lists.htm (see below). Does the test also fail for 1.2.0? I'll try to run a stacktrace in gdb tomorrow. Great! I like to fix it before 1.2.1 Summary of my perl5 (5.0 patchlevel 4