Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-25 Thread Vlad Safronov
Hi, What is the right way of authorizing users under Mason? Should it be done as PerlAccessHandler or coded in handler.pl? --- # require myhandler.pl PerlAccessHandler Apache::MyAccessHandler PerlHandler HTML::Mason --- Vlad

Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-25 Thread David Jacobs
I think *all* job postings and offers should be forked to another list. This should be mod_perl only! Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: > At 11:46 22.06.2002, Ged Haywood wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Zac Morris wrote: >> >> > Old fashioned is right, >> >> Can we decide whether this ki

Re: Knowing your limitation - was Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-24 Thread Zac Morris
ong gone. This means we ALL need to learn to be adaptable, pragmatic, and focused on standard ways of getting jobs done, and challenge every "old world" philosophy that holds that back. -Zac ----- Original Message - From: "Gunther Birznieks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To

OT Job discussion, was Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-22 Thread Tom Mornini
On Saturday, June 22, 2002, at 02:46 AM, Ged Haywood wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Zac Morris wrote: > >> Old fashioned is right, > > Can we decide whether this kind of post is or is not welcome on the > List? For what it's worth, my inclusion of the list address on my reply was entirely accid

RE: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-22 Thread stevea
>> Old fashioned is right, > Can we decide whether this kind of post is or is not welcome on the List? Hang on Ged, I'm thinking that there might be a community opportunity to develop a library of tools that will solve the obvious problem here. Would it be possible to provide a solution for vis

Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-22 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 11:46 22.06.2002, Ged Haywood wrote: >Hi all, > >On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Zac Morris wrote: > > > Old fashioned is right, > >Can we decide whether this kind of post is or is not welcome on the List? > >My 0.02 is that if someone has decided on the terms of reference for >an offer of employment whic

Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-22 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi all, On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Zac Morris wrote: > Old fashioned is right, Can we decide whether this kind of post is or is not welcome on the List? My 0.02 is that if someone has decided on the terms of reference for an offer of employment which he is making then if it's legal, that's the way i

Re: Knowing your limitation - was Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Gunther Birznieks
quot;talking head", >>an IM box, or a voice on the telephone. It becomes less "personalized" >>and easier to "pick and choose" the best componants into a greater >>whole. It also isolates the individual who may end up doing a lot of >>refactoring to present

Knowing your limitation - was Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Tom Mornini
ust something to consider.  Open youself to the best people in the world and don't accept just the best you can find in your area, and you'll find that you solutions aren't also as limited...   -Zac Morris - Original Message - From: Tom Mornini To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu

Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Zac Morris
ring to present the final solution.   Just something to consider.  Open youself to the best people in the world and don't accept just the best you can find in your area, and you'll find that you solutions aren't also as limited...   -Zac Morris     - Original Message -

Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Phil Dobbin
On 21/6/02 at 17:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stas Bekman) wrote: > > Phil Dobbin wrote: > > On 20/6/02 at 20:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Mornini) wrote: > > >>If you're a good Perl programmer who has a strong sense of "the way > it > >>should be" and can be simultaneously mean, nasty, angry, distrust

Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Phil Dobbin wrote: > On 20/6/02 at 20:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Mornini) wrote: >>If you're a good Perl programmer who has a strong sense of "the way it >>should be" and can be simultaneously mean, nasty, angry, distrustful >>and [...] > Sorry if I haven't kept up with this thread but, is thi

Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
Phil Dobbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry if I haven't kept up with this thread but, is this really the > way the mod_perl list is going to go? I hope so. All these job postings are making me feel warm and fuzzy for the future. -- Dave Hodgkinson, Wizard for Hire http://www.daveh

Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Phil Dobbin
On 20/6/02 at 20:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Mornini) wrote: > We're 1 year into development of a system that is OO Perl, mod_perl, > DBI and DBD::Oracle on Linux. > > We've spent a lot of energy doing it right and writing tests as we go. > This has given us huge benefits in the life of the proje

[JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-20 Thread Tom Mornini
We're 1 year into development of a system that is OO Perl, mod_perl, DBI and DBD::Oracle on Linux. We've spent a lot of energy doing it right and writing tests as we go. This has given us huge benefits in the life of the project, but our current whitebox tester has decided to move to Washington, D