Tom Servo wrote:
>
> I was told over the weekend by one of my old eToys cow-orkers that the
> current incarnation of www.etoys.com isn't running our old code. Leave
> it to KB to buy all the code then not bother to use it.
>
> I understand that's also the reason they couldn't be bothered to mi
> Perrin or others involved in the old eToys (or anyone in the new
Toys) --
> does anyone know if this is the same mod_perl technology you guys wrote?
I'm not involved in that anymore, so I don't have first-hand information.
However, a brief look at the site makes me think they are not using any
At 12:26 PM 10/25/2001 +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>I saw an article in today's ComputerWorld that indicates the technology et
>al for eToys was bought by another toy firm (KB) and they plan to put it
>up to sell toys for this holiday season again.
>
>http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0
I was told over the weekend by one of my old eToys cow-orkers that the
current incarnation of www.etoys.com isn't running our old code. Leave
it to KB to buy all the code then not bother to use it.
I understand that's also the reason they couldn't be bothered to migrate
the old accounts over.
I saw an article in today's ComputerWorld that indicates the technology et
al for eToys was bought by another toy firm (KB) and they plan to put it up
to sell toys for this holiday season again.
http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO65008,00.html
Perrin or others involved in t
