On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 08:51:48AM +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> >I'm a huge fan of passing Date::Simple objects, which can then take a
> >strftime format string:
> > [% date.format("%d %b %y") %]
> > [% date.format("%Y-%m-%d") %]
> And the latter does not require a programmer?
Of course
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 09:14:25AM +0100, Tony Bowden wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:08:56PM -0400, Sam Tregar wrote:
> > > Suppose you have a model object for a concert which includes a date. On
> > > one page, the designers want to dipslay the date in a verbose way with
> > > the month spe
At 04:14 PM 6/7/2002, Tony Bowden wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:08:56PM -0400, Sam Tregar wrote:
> > > Suppose you have a model object for a concert which includes a date. On
> > > one page, the designers want to dipslay the date in a verbose way with
> > > the month spelled out, but on anot
Hey Tony --
>I'm a huge fan of passing Date::Simple objects, which can then take a
>strftime format string:
>
> [% date.format("%d %b %y") %]
> [% date.format("%Y-%m-%d") %]
Out of curiosity, at what point of flexibility do you feel it is OK for your
designers to go back to the programmers?
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:08:56PM -0400, Sam Tregar wrote:
> > Suppose you have a model object for a concert which includes a date. On
> > one page, the designers want to dipslay the date in a verbose way with
> > the month spelled out, but on another they want it abbreviated and fixed
> > lengt
