Re: Apache::DBI for persistent connections

2002-10-15 Thread Perrin Harkins
Paul Simon wrote: > I was under the impression that Apache::DBI isn't compatible for this > set up: > > win2000 + apache2.0.42 + perl5.8 + mod_perl1.99 > > For a multi threaded environment, isn't Apache::DBIPool necessary? I'd > rather use Apache::DBI. Apache::DBIPool doesn't actually exist

Re: Apache::DBI for persistent connections

2002-10-15 Thread Paul Simon
I was under the impression that Apache::DBI isn't compatible for this set up: win2000 + apache2.0.42 + perl5.8 + mod_perl1.99 For a multi threaded environment, isn't Apache::DBIPool necessary?  I'd rather use Apache::DBI.   Rafiq Ismail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Paul Simon wro