| It occurs to me that there would be no overhead to speak of in using a
| sequence number, given that Apache::Registry already maintains a hash for
| its generated package names for mtime checks. Something like:
Why not use (stat($script))[0,1] device and inode numbers of the script
being
Oh ghod, what have I started... :)
I promise not to add footnotes to my messages in future...
/Pete/
I've been off this list for over a year, so I may be covering ground that
I've failed to find in the archives, but whatever...
I've had occasion to examine the internals of Apache::Registry recently[1]
and have been reminded of the unfeasably long package names that it
generates for scripts.
