So the moral of the story is, don't ever trust the client for anything
important.
> I still think that's missing an important point:
>
> YOU CAN'T HAVE a canonical listing of HTTP_USER_AGENT values, because NO
> SUCH ANIMAL exists :) All HTTP_USER_AGENT is is a stri
-
> From: "Bill Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "raptor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 4:59 AM
> Subject: Re: HTTP_USER_AGENT
>
>
> > on 3/31/00 2:43 PM,
d.
I still think that's missing an important point:
YOU CAN'T HAVE a canonical listing of HTTP_USER_AGENT values, because NO
SUCH ANIMAL exists :) All HTTP_USER_AGENT is is a string supplied by the
client, and as long as the client follows the spec for what the string is
supposed to look l
-3743 ex: 133
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "raptor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 4:59 AM
Subject: Re: HTTP_USER_AGENT
> on 3/31/00 2:43 PM, rapt
on 3/31/00 2:43 PM, raptor at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> HTTP_USER_AGENT :
>
> IE3.x,4.x,5,5.5
> NN3.x,4.x
> may be other too...
>
W3C maybe ?
- FCCJ * 501 W State St * Jacksonville, Fl 32202 * 904/632-3089 -
hi,
can someone point me to a place where I can see all the strings generated for
HTTP_USER_AGENT :
IE3.x,4.x,5,5.5
NN3.x,4.x
may be other too...
thanx
=
iVAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
