Re: Idiot question: headers at the base of the page.

2002-06-13 Thread Jon Robison
header twice (it's happened), it could be something else is > automatically sending header s for you... > > Just an idea... > Issac > > - Original Message - > From: "Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: Idiot question: headers at the base of the page.

2002-06-13 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi all, On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Issac Goldstand wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:19 AM > > > Under what circumstances would my page render, dumping the HTTP > > headers at the base?

Re: Idiot question: headers at the base of the page.

2002-06-13 Thread Issac Goldstand
OTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:19 AM Subject: Idiot question: headers at the base of the page. > I'm doing squinty eyed coding and need someone to knock common sense into > me. In the right order - as far as I can see - I have my content_type

Idiot question: headers at the base of the page.

2002-06-12 Thread Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN)
I'm doing squinty eyed coding and need someone to knock common sense into me. In the right order - as far as I can see - I have my content_type ;send_http_headers; $r->print'ed. With loads of poo in between. Under what circumstances would my page render, dumping the HTTP headers at the base? O