> "KGM" == Keith G Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KGM> When using a modular mod_perl, I get a huge leak if I preload the 'Pg'
KGM> driver in my startup perl script thus:
Hmmm. Interesting theory. I shall have to investigate it. I also
see a multi-megabyte memory leak in my app when DB
Juha-Mikko Ahonen wrote:
I looked into it with the following setup:
apache 1.3.26-0woody1
libapache-mod-perl 1.27-2
postgresql 7.2.1-2woody2
There was a Test.pm module handling all requests for /. It opened a
connection to the database and fetched a couple of rows.
With DBI->install_driver('Pg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> OK, it gets weirder. The following script produces the leak. If I
> comment out the install_driver line, I get a big old segfault! Same
> if I comment out the Apache::DBI line in addition. This works with
> plain apache, or apache-ssl.
>
> #!/usr
[debian-isp readers, to recap, I'm trying to confirm a
memory-leak/segfault problem with Debian stable plus apache(-ssl) plus
libapache-mod-perl. The memory leak happens upon
/etc/init.d/apache(-ssl) reload. You can see my startup script and my
other comments below.]
Juha-Mikko Ahonen wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 16 October 2002 22:52, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> It's not like it was an obvious problem: I only got the DSO to leak
> when loading the Pg driver. That's pretty obscure.
Have you tried to connect() without loading the Pg driver first? E.
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:01:33PM -0500, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
>>
>>My own bug report is now 47 days old, without apparent followup.
Hmmm, I probably should not have posted that. Sounds like a major whine.
>
>
> That's because I'm having an attack of real life. I
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:01:33PM -0500, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> Ged Haywood wrote:
> >Hi there,
> >
> >On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> >
> >
> >>do you mean that the problems with the loadable module overall are
> >>so well-known that no one in his right mind should ever use it?
>
Ged Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
>
>
>>>Significant improvements have been made in
>>>the reliability of mod_perl as DSO and nowadays there is much less
>>>discussion about it on this list.
>>
>>Are you sure it's not because 'most everyone has sil
Hi there,
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> > Significant improvements have been made in
> > the reliability of mod_perl as DSO and nowadays there is much less
> > discussion about it on this list.
>
> Are you sure it's not because 'most everyone has silently given up on it?
Yes,
eith G. Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 2:02 PM
> To: mod_perl Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Memory leak on reload when the 'Pg' driver is preloaded
>
>
> Ged Haywood wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, K
Juha-Mikko Ahonen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 16 October 2002 20:25, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
>
>>By "should", do you mean that the problems with the loadable module
>>overall are so well-known that no one in his right mind should ever
>>use it?
>
>
Ged Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
>
>
>>do you mean that the problems with the loadable module overall are
>>so well-known that no one in his right mind should ever use it?
>
>
> It's not as bad as that. Significant improvements have been made in
Hi there,
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> do you mean that the problems with the loadable module overall are
> so well-known that no one in his right mind should ever use it?
It's not as bad as that. Significant improvements have been made in
the reliability of mod_perl as DSO an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 16 October 2002 20:25, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> By "should", do you mean that the problems with the loadable module
> overall are so well-known that no one in his right mind should ever
> use it?
Yes. The problems with DSO mod_perl are w
Stathy G. Touloumis wrote:
>
>
>> Using Debian's static-mod_perled apache-perl eliminates the problem.
>
>
> Do you mean you are using the 'so' version that comes with Debian?
Yes, in the case that failed. The package is called 'libapache-mod-perl'.
>
> You
> should be using the static bui
>Using Debian's static-mod_perled apache-perl eliminates the problem.
Do you mean you are using the 'so' version that comes with Debian? You
should be using the static build of apache/mod_perl
Since memory leaks seem to be the topic du jour, I wondered if anyone
else had seen this one:
When using a modular mod_perl, I get a huge leak if I preload the 'Pg'
driver in my startup perl script thus:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use Apache::Status ();
use Apache::DBI ();
DBI->install_driver
17 matches
Mail list logo
