Re: eating memory ... // RE: Porting to OS X

On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Alvar Freude wrote: > probably it's the same as on FreeBSD: if you use a DSO mod_perl, for each > restart (apachectl graceful or apachectl restart) it eats all the memory > your mod_perl modules use. Try to build it statically; at least on FreeBSD > it helps, and OSX is FreeBS

eating memory ... // RE: Porting to OS X

Hi, -- Michael Robinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > application, which runs on an aging 486 with 64 megs in our shop and uses > about 4 megs including mod_perl enhanced apache, took 40 megs on OSX and > was very slow. This was on a G4 with 500 megs of memory. probably it's the same as on FreeB

Re: Porting to OS X

David Wheeler wrote: >On 6/4/02 10:54 AM, "Vuillemot, Ward W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >claimed: > >>I think it is relatively an easy move, IMHO. Just beaware that the Mac OS >>filesystem is NOT case-sensitive. Which can cause problems with certain >>applications. . .and we hope (Apple, you listenin

Re: Porting to OS X

> "David" == David Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I think it is relatively an easy move, IMHO. Just beaware that the Mac OS >> filesystem is NOT case-sensitive. Which can cause problems with certain >> applications. . .and we hope (Apple, you listening?) that they will fix this >> g

RE: Porting to OS X

At 11:27 AM 6/4/02 -0700, Michael Robinton wrote: >I'd be very interested in how this progresses. I recently helped a >collegue to get a cgi program running under apache using standard perl on >OSX -- I found that the perl distribution that comes with OSX is the >original 5.6 rather than more up

RE: Porting to OS X

From: "Noam Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Porting to OS X Date sent:Tue, 4 Jun 2002 13:43:11 -0400 >[ Double-click this line for list subscription options ] > >Can anyone give me a rough i

Re: Porting to OS X [OT] OS X

>> I think it is relatively an easy move, IMHO. Just beaware that the >> Mac OS filesystem is NOT case-sensitive. Which can cause problems >> with certain applications. . .and we hope (Apple, you listening?) that >> they will fix this gross over-sight. I agree it's a problem, and it's cause

Re: Porting to OS X

On 6/4/02 10:54 AM, "Vuillemot, Ward W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> claimed: > I think it is relatively an easy move, IMHO. Just beaware that the Mac OS > filesystem is NOT case-sensitive. Which can cause problems with certain > applications. . .and we hope (Apple, you listening?) that they will fix th

RE: Porting to OS X

This is going OT, but the case insensitivity problem is only for the Mac filesystems. I've that all you need to do is switch the filesystem to ufs (the bsd version) and the problem is solved. Of course, if you can't switch fs types I don't know of a workaround. :-) Drew At 10:54 AM 6/4/02 -07

RE: Porting to OS X

hope (Apple, you listening?) that they will fix this gross over-sight.   Cheers, Ward -Original Message-From: Noam Solomon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:43 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Porting to OS X Can anyone give me a rough idea how much ti

Re: Porting to OS X

On 6/4/02 10:43 AM, "Noam Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> claimed: > Can anyone give me a rough idea how much time it would take to move a server > serving mod_perl websites > from UNIX to OS X? It uses Apache::Session, DBI::Mysql, HTML::Mason, CGI, and > Apache::OpenIndex, > among others, and use

Porting to OS X

Can anyone give me a rough idea how much time it would take to move a server serving mod_perl websites from UNIX to OS X?  It uses Apache::Session, DBI::Mysql, HTML::Mason, CGI, and Apache::OpenIndex, among others,  and uses both AuthHandlers and AuthzHandlers.   I know it's difficult to esti