At 09:12 19/10/1999 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote:
We were planning to put a good deal of the stuff into a db too I think. I
guess it doesn't matter too much if we have duplicated content as long as
it is in sync. We will have to take into account what you are doing so that
we can cross-link
At 09:12 19/10/1999 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote:
We were planning to put a good deal of the stuff into a db too I think. I
guess it doesn't matter too much if we have duplicated content as long as
it is in sync. We will have to take into account what you are doing so that
we can cross-link
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, let's stop talking about "you" and "we", we are all "we" :) No
competition, only collaboration. James is working on this application,
which is in pretty good stage (James?), why in the world would you want to
write something else from scratch? James'
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My personal comment on both of your previews, is that they are very cool!
But while being flattered with having a Guide as part of the main menu,
this is unfair to other folks who wrote an invaluable documentation
(Vivek, Frank and other).
For my part,
Robin Berjon [EMAIL PROTECTED] sez:
As a side note, reading about that desert idea this morning triggered a
neuron somehow, so I quickly modified an old template of mine that hadn't
been used and uploaded it at http://www.knowscape.org/modperl/ ...
Adding my vote to this too, I think it
At 19:02 12/10/1999 -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
- mod_perl news.
- mod_perl FAQs, developer's guides and documentation.
- mod_perl evangelism, quantitative and anecdotal comparison with similar
tools.
We need a little crowd of people to keep especially the news and acecdotes
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Matt Arnold wrote:
[...]
some extent, I believe people are put off by what they find. The
information isn't necessarily poor, it just isn't what they expect.
Indeed.
- mod_perl news.
- mod_perl FAQs, developer's guides and documentation.
- mod_perl evangelism,
