-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> >
>> > [+ $forum->title +]
>>
>> The problem with this is that it looks really ugly in
> >Dreamweaver (for example).
http://www.somewhere.com/software/ has the DreamWeaver extensions
that will make EmbPerl tags look just like ASP or CF
>
> > [+ $forum->title +]
>
> The problem with this is that it looks really ugly in
> Dreamweaver (for example).
That's a matter of taste...
And because it's a matter of taste (what is one of the results for me of
this discussion, everybody likes his aproach most :-), I have designed
On 27-Jul-2000 Jauder Ho wrote:
>
>
> The template may be kept in memory but it needs to be reparsed to insert
> real values, no? What I would like to see is a way to say the template is
> static (header/footer) and does not need to be reparse/regenerated each
> time and comparitively small port
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [+ $forum->title +]
The problem with this is that it looks really ugly in
Dreamweaver (for example). The HTML designer can't design a
mock-up page with dummy content using that technique that can
then be passed off t
On 27-Jul-2000 Jauder Ho wrote:
>
> No. The problem is that you cannot cache the subsequent page that is
> generated because of the dynamic component. The template is always going
> to remain the same (interface changes should be rare for a stable web
> site), but the content (say news headlines
No. The problem is that you cannot cache the subsequent page that is
generated because of the dynamic component. The template is always going
to remain the same (interface changes should be rare for a stable web
site), but the content (say news headlines or personalized component) is
going to be
> I could go off about why HTML sucks for dynamic page caching. If there was
> somehow a way to cache say the template, leaving only the same dynamic
> portion uncached, it would certainly help things along quite a bit. If
> anyone knows of a good way of doing this I would certainly be interested