Joe Schaefer writes:
A causal reading seems to suggest that most mod_perl-based
templating systems do exactly what this patent will cover:
i.e. set up a non-HTML based website where templates
dynamically convert non-HTML files into HTML.
IANAL (and IVAGINAL too, but that's for a different
Is this applying to an application based tool only or does it also apply
to web based tools? We have a product that we have licensed out for 4
years or so that does exactly this via the web( approx 5000 sites are
using it now ). I am sure others do as well.
Just not sure what the scope of
Hi all,
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Nathan Torkington wrote:
Joe Schaefer writes:
A causal reading seems to suggest that most mod_perl-based
templating systems do exactly what this patent will cover:
the tool generates the customized Web site without the web site
creator writing any HTML or
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Has anyone else noticed this?
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2Sect2=HITOFFp=1u=/netahtml/search-bool.htmlr=10f=Gl=50co1=ANDd=ft00s1=HTMLOS=HTMLRS=HTML
A causal reading seems to suggest that most mod_perl-based
templating systems do exactly what
: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:03 PM
To: Nathan Torkington
Cc: Joe Schaefer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IBM patents Template Systems?
Hi all,
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Nathan Torkington wrote:
Joe Schaefer writes:
A causal reading seems to suggest that most mod_perl-based
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Ged Haywood wrote:
An only slightly less casual reading indicates that anyone who writes
use strict;
or
html
isn't at risk of violating this patent.
It looks to me that products like Zope or Midgard are more going to be in
violation, but since they are Python and
Ged Haywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Nathan Torkington wrote:
Joe Schaefer writes:
A causal reading seems to suggest that most mod_perl-based
templating systems do exactly what this patent will cover:
the tool generates the customized Web site without the
