On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Paul G. Weiss wrote:
> OK, until I can decide whether to take a chance on FreeBSD-current
> or to convince my employers who were so enamored of FreeBSD that
> we should rebuild the server with Linux, I'm going prefork.
worth skimming the [EMAIL PROTECTED] archives. if the
22 PM
> To: 'Doug MacEachern'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Perl_Tstack_sp_ptr
>
>
> I suspect that pre-fork would work too, but I'm desparately
> trying to get threads working.
>
> Here is apr.h
>
> [/usr/local/apache2/htdocs/perl]# grep
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Paul G. Weiss wrote:
> I suspect that pre-fork would work too, but I'm desparately
> trying to get threads working.
you should try a different os then. i'm sitting next to the guy who wrote
worker mpm, he says the freebsd thread library does not work well enough
for use
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> so the problem that I see on linux is unrelated?
dunno, i built with -Duseshrplib and seems ok linkage wise. tho
some ModPerl-Registry are tests failing with the same problem in
special_blocks:
# testing : ModPerl::Registry is not running BEGIN blocks
8 (bytes)
0x (NULL) 0x0
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:41 PM
> To: Paul G. Weiss
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Perl_Tstack_sp_ptr
>
>
> On Tue, 1
could this be a version of freebsd with broken threads support? i've
> heard many cases of that. chances are if you rebuild perl without
> -Dusethreads and apache with the prefork mpm, this problem won't be
there.
so the problem that I see on linux is unrelated?
this tested with prefork Apa
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> could this be a version of freebsd with broken threads support? i've
> heard many cases of that. chances are if you rebuild perl without
> -Dusethreads and apache with the prefork mpm, this problem won't be there.
this is likely the problem. i
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Paul G. Weiss wrote:
> I had already thought of that. Strace shows that the
> correct libperl.so is the one that is being loaded. Just
> to make sure I deleted all others and did
>
> ln -s /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-freebsd-thread-multi/CORE /usr/lib
>
> but strace tells
e accept, does the two fcntl's then the break
then back to the accept. Can you make any sense of this?
-P
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:30 AM
> To: Paul G. Weiss
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sounds like the old freebsd plague of installing libperl.so into
/usr/local/lib. that is, the dist installs libperl.so where it should not
be installed, /usr/local/lib, then a user compiles/installs on their
own and libperl.so is installed where it should be, in your case likely:
/usr/lib/pe
I should also mention -- my perl is patched with the patch
to DynaLoader.pm that Doug MacEachern posted in this list.
-P
> -Original Message-
> From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:06 AM
> To: Paul G. Weiss
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Paul G. Weiss wrote:
> Sorry if this has been covered - I searched to no avail.
>
> I'm getting the following error when trying to start
> an Apache 2.0.36 with ModPerl::Registry:
>
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-freebsd-thread-multi/auto/Apache/Request
> Rec/R
12 matches
Mail list logo
