"Randal L. Schwartz" wrote:
>
> > "Drew" == Drew Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Drew> I have read debates in the past about which browsers will reliably
> Drew> accept gzip content. Do you have a list of such browsers? IIRC, it was
> Drew> IE that was the most troublesome w/ proper d
> "Drew" == Drew Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Drew> I have read debates in the past about which browsers will reliably
Drew> accept gzip content. Do you have a list of such browsers? IIRC, it was
Drew> IE that was the most troublesome w/ proper display.
Why base it on browser? Won't c
Drew Taylor wrote:
> I have read debates in the past about which browsers will reliably
> accept gzip content. Do you have a list of such browsers? IIRC, it was
> IE that was the most troublesome w/ proper display.
We don't make an explicit blessed browser list, we let the browser
writers tell us
Devin Ben-Hur wrote:
>
> Bruce Lo wrote:
> >
> > I tried out Apache::GzipChain for dynamic mod_perl pages (using Apache::Registry),
>and it was great for reducing the download time (especially over modem). I am
>seriously thinking about using it for our production environment. However, some
Bruce Lo wrote:
>
> I tried out Apache::GzipChain for dynamic mod_perl pages (using Apache::Registry),
>and it was great for reducing the download time (especially over modem). I am
>seriously thinking about using it for our production environment. However, some
>people are concerned about i
