On 3 Dec 2000, Greg Stark wrote:
> Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > > Lately I've been getting very interested in using solid-state disks
> > > for high-performance issues. They're expensive, but if you need that
> > > much speed, they'
Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > Lately I've been getting very interested in using solid-state disks
> > for high-performance issues. They're expensive, but if you need that
> > much speed, they're worth it.
>
> Are they? I tried one once,
Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > Lately I've been getting very interested in using solid-state disks
> > for high-performance issues. They're expensive, but if you need that
> > much speed, they're worth it.
>
> Are they? I tried one once, and it wasn't any
On 3 Nov 2000, David Hodgkinson wrote:
> > In my tests, a modern version of mod_proxy (serving from cache) was faster
> > than Squid on Linux.
>
> Really? Cool. What about taking memory usage into account?
Well, Squid is kind of a memory hog and mod_proxy has been extremely light
and well-behav
Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 3 Nov 2000, David Hodgkinson wrote:
> > Dare I add that Squid has plenty of low-latency cacheing features you
> > could use?
>
> In my tests, a modern version of mod_proxy (serving from cache) was faster
> than Squid on Linux.
Really? Cool. What
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
> Lately I've been getting very interested in using solid-state disks
> for high-performance issues. They're expensive, but if you need that
> much speed, they're worth it.
Are they? I tried one once, and it wasn't any faster than my normal disk
because I
On 3 Nov 2000, David Hodgkinson wrote:
> Dare I add that Squid has plenty of low-latency cacheing features you
> could use?
In my tests, a modern version of mod_proxy (serving from cache) was faster
than Squid on Linux.
- Perrin
> "MS" == Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MS> doing it this way. If you're that concerned about perhaps the weight of
MS> Apache + mod_perl, consider trying TUX or thttpd, or something else
MS> lightweight written in C.
Lately I've been getting very interested in using solid-state
Hi all,
> At 09:46 AM 11/3/00 +, Nigel Hamilton wrote:
> >I would like to write this mini-server in perl ... but maybe a threaded
> >programming language is better?
> >I'm contracting for an Ad Serving company and we were mooting the idea of
> >writing our own lean and mean web server for ser
Other than some of the caching other people talked about (eg squid)...You
might also take a look at mod_mmap to hold the ads in shared memory among
the Apache processes and still use mod_perl for the logic of which ad to serve.
Later,
Gunther
At 09:46 AM 11/3/00 +, Nigel Hamilton wrote
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> egads, don't do it... Web servers are well developed for this kind of
> thing, and modern filesystems (e.g. ext2fs) will buffer the ads in RAM
> anyway if you have enough. You're not likely to get any speed increase
> doing it this way. If you're that c
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Nigel Hamilton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm contracting for an Ad Serving company and we were mooting the idea of
> writing our own lean and mean web server for serving the Ads.
>
> We would like to hold all the Ads in memory (each Ad is less than 20K).
>
> The next thing is to cre
12 matches
Mail list logo
