Re: Linux Hello World: TT Optimized...

2000-12-12 Thread newsreader
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:14:56PM -0800, Joshua Chamas wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Could you please explain the differences between > > CGI Raw and CGI.pm? I'm using oo method of > > CGI. > The Raw CGI test makes no use of CGI.pm, just issues raw print > statements that sets up

Re: Linux Hello World: TT Optimized...

2000-12-12 Thread Stas Bekman
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Jeremy Howard wrote: > Joshua Chamas wrote: > > If you are using CGI.pm object methods, I would worry about calling > > all those methods to build your HTML and if you are performance > > minded, I would use them frugally. > > > IIRC, CGI.pm is actually slower to run the func

Re: Linux Hello World: TT Optimized...

2000-12-11 Thread Jeremy Howard
Joshua Chamas wrote: > If you are using CGI.pm object methods, I would worry about calling > all those methods to build your HTML and if you are performance > minded, I would use them frugally. > IIRC, CGI.pm is actually slower to run the functional syntax than the object syntax. This is because a

Re: Linux Hello World: TT Optimized...

2000-12-11 Thread Joshua Chamas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Could you please explain the differences between > CGI Raw and CGI.pm? I'm using oo method of > CGI. > > Thanks > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 07:56:03PM -0800, Joshua Chamas wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Updated results from the other day with the Template Toolkit > > benc

Re: Linux Hello World: TT Optimized...

2000-12-11 Thread newsreader
Could you please explain the differences between CGI Raw and CGI.pm? I'm using oo method of CGI. Thanks On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 07:56:03PM -0800, Joshua Chamas wrote: > Hey, > > Updated results from the other day with the Template Toolkit > benchmark properly optimized, thanks Perrin! >