Re: Problems with installing mod_perl

2000-06-09 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Steffers wrote: > fair enough, always willing to conceed that i can be wrong > +BUT+ > since signal-11 is a 'well defined' unix standard meaning > hardware 'error' isnt it rather a bad signal to choose for a > non-hardware error ? > > (hell, even HP-UX uses sig11 for hardw

Re: Problems with installing mod_perl

2000-06-09 Thread Steffers
> > that shouldnt really matter, since its a signal 11 from a > > process, then its either : > it does matter, there are several discussions you'll find in the archives > on how Perl's largefile support triggers this problem. > fair enough, always willing to conceed that i can be wrong +BUT+ s

Re: Problems with installing mod_perl

2000-06-09 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Steffers wrote: > that shouldnt really matter, since its a signal 11 from a > process, then its either : it does matter, there are several discussions you'll find in the archives on how Perl's largefile support triggers this problem.

Re: Problems with installing mod_perl

2000-06-09 Thread Steffers
Thomas wrote: > > I have some problems installing mod_perl. > > My system is a Mandrake 7.0 Kernel 2.2.14. > > I have compiled apache 1.3.12 mod_ssl 2.6.4/openssl 0.9.5a > > with DSO. Next, I compiled php4RC2 with apxs and > > apache runs correctly. > > But after installing mod_perl with: > > perl

Re: Problems with installing mod_perl

2000-06-09 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Wrobel, Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > I have some problems installing mod_perl. > My system is a Mandrake 7.0 Kernel 2.2.14. > I have compiled apache 1.3.12 mod_ssl 2.6.4/openssl 0.9.5a > with DSO. Next, I compiled php4RC2 with apxs and > apache runs correctly. > But after installi