Hi all,
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Mark Coffman wrote:
> > Try running "which perl" and use that path for your #!/usr/bin/perl line.
> > Then rename your script as .cgi and see if that helps.
Of course none of this absolves Christina from reading the Eagle Book,
the mod_perl Guide, the Cookbook (Geo
- Original Message -
From:
Mark Coffman
To: Christina ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: CGI Scripts w/mod_perl
Try
running "which perl" and use that path for your #!/usr/bin/perl
line.
Then
rename your script as .cgi a
On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Mark Coffman wrote:
> Try running "which perl" and use that path for your #!/usr/bin/perl line.
> Then rename your script as .cgi and see if that helps.
Um.. yeah, ignore all my "locate" tribble. 'which' is the way to go.
That wasn't a question.
Try
running "which perl" and use that path for your #!/usr/bin/perl
line.
Then
rename your script as .cgi and see if that helps.
Mark
-Original Message-From: Christina
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 9:32
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: CGI Scripts
Hi there,
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Mike Egglestone wrote:
> ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /var/www/Scripts/
> ...and later down the file
> AddHandler cgi-script .cgi
Look for mention of the ScriptaAlias directive in
http://perl/apache.org/guide
> Options ExecCGI FollowSymLinks
You might want to inves
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> Most normal applications do not require every bit of speed eeked out
> of them that may be possible with an Apache handler. In the mod_perl
> guide, a reasonably fast machine (which most production mod_perl sites
> run on) shows very little time diff
> "GB" == Gunther Birznieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GB> Apache::Registry programs are basically compatible with Velocigen,
GB> PerlEx, and SpeedyCGI acceleration. I think that's a huge
GB> commercial and open source advantage for anyone writing web
GB> programs for sale or open community
At 03:04 PM 11/19/2000 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > "Didier" == Didier Godefroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Didier> on 11/19/00 4:55 PM, Ime Smits at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered the following:
> >> | How do we make sure regular CGI scripts are using mod_perl???
> >> | Is there a way t
Find the time to READ the documentation
Tonight would be a good nite.
Ruben
http://www.mrbrklyn.com
> At the moment, I'm just trying to get mod_perl to work and have users'
> scripts use it. I haven't had time to read docs on how to use it, only
> enough to get it going.
> Will it speed up
>
> When you're *really* good with mod_perl, you abandon Apache::Registry
> and move up to writing handlers or using embedded templating systems
> like EmbPerl, Mason, or Template Toolkit.
Actually, if your using EMBPERL, why even BOTHER with the CGI interface
at all.
But I think that EMBPERL u
on 11/19/00 6:04 PM, Randal L. Schwartz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered the
following:
> Didier> Can I assume that whenever mod_perl is enabled that all existing perl
> Didier> scripts use it without any modification of any kind?
>
> Not at all. Apache::Registry is a good stop-gap, but you have to
> "Didier" == Didier Godefroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Didier> on 11/19/00 4:55 PM, Ime Smits at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered the following:
>> | How do we make sure regular CGI scripts are using mod_perl???
>> | Is there a way to find out?
>>
>> Check $ENV{MOD_PERL}, it should read somethin
on 11/19/00 4:55 PM, Ime Smits at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered the following:
> | How do we make sure regular CGI scripts are using mod_perl???
> | Is there a way to find out?
>
> Check $ENV{MOD_PERL}, it should read something like "mod_perl/1.24".
Can I assume that whenever mod_perl is enabled th
| How do we make sure regular CGI scripts are using mod_perl???
| Is there a way to find out?
Check $ENV{MOD_PERL}, it should read something like "mod_perl/1.24".
Ime
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On Tue, 16 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Actually, as I found out yesterday, it didn't fix it.
> I still just get the source. Further information.
> The symptoms were that I wasn't getting redirected properly. Yesterday
> some pieces finally came together which put me to the following
15 matches
Mail list logo
