quot;mod_perl Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: libperl.so vs mod_perl.so
> Ryan -
>
> I upgraded to perl 5.6 and when I built mod_perl it used the right one, I
> would guess that it would only build it against 5.0 if you didn&#x
apache
> --with-layout=FreeBSD
>
> -- Ryan
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ged Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Mike Loiterman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "mod_perl Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursd
Hi Mike -
I have the same setup. You should see something like this:
$ egrep -i perl httpd.conf
LoadModule perl_modulelibexec/apache/libperl.so
AddModule mod_perl.c
# apachectl graceful
# tail /www/logs/error.log
[Thu Apr 11 14:53:31 2002] [notice] Apache/1.3.22 (Unix) mod_perl/1.26
quot;mod_perl Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: libperl.so vs mod_perl.so
> Hi there,
>
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Mike Loiterman wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> There's really no ne
Hi there,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Mike Loiterman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
There's really no need for all this... :)
> but there is no entry for LoadModule /libexec/apache/mod_perl.so
That's because mod_perl.so doesn't exist.
> There is a an entry for libperl.so and there is a
