Re: mod_perl book status

2001-12-18 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi all, On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > >From one of Geoffrey's digests: > > You can disable Apache::DBI database handle persistence on the fly > > wish I could still do those :) Yeah... > a few versions ago, DBI did one better and added the dbi_connect_method > connect attribu

Re: mod_perl book status

2001-12-18 Thread Geoffrey Young
> > >From one of Geoffrey's digests: > > You can disable Apache::DBI database handle persistence on the fly > by changing DBI->connect() to the undocumented 5 parameter call > $dbh = DBI->connect($dbase, $user, $pass, \%attr, > undef, "connect") || die $DBI::

Re: mod_perl book status

2001-12-18 Thread Perrin Harkins
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote (privately, discussing a book review:): > > > Ged wrote: > > > > If you want to use C but you have both situations on > > one machine, at the time of writing the only solution is to run two > > mod_perl enabled servers, one which uses C and one > >

Re: mod_perl book status

2001-12-18 Thread Robert Landrum
At 9:58 AM + 12/18/01, Ged Haywood wrote: >Hi all, > >On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote (privately, discussing a book review:): > >> Ged wrote: >> >> If you want to use C but you have both situations on >> one machine, at the time of writing the only solution is to run two >> mod_p

Re: mod_perl book status

2001-12-18 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi all, On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote (privately, discussing a book review:): > Ged wrote: > > If you want to use C but you have both situations on > one machine, at the time of writing the only solution is to run two > mod_perl enabled servers, one which uses C and one > which