According to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I will probably do that next. I am not clear what the difference is
> between running squid and doing a mod_proxy, in the case of all dynamic
> content... a remark in the tuning guide that i saw back in June was vague about
> this, saying it wasnt clear whether s
Thanks,
I will probably do that next. I am not clear what the difference is
between running squid and doing a mod_proxy, in the case of all dynamic
content... a remark in the tuning guide that i saw back in June was vague about
this, saying it wasnt clear whether squid can cache larger doucments
According to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> I still have resisted the squid layer (dumb
> stubbornness I think), and instead got myself another IP address on the
> same interface card, bound the smallest most light weight separate
> apache to it that I could make, and prefixed all image requests with
>
> "j" == jb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
j> comments or corrections most welcome.. i freely admit to not having
j> enough time to read the archives of this group before posting.
Well, that would have saved you lots of effort in re-learning the
lessons discussed and documented regarding memor
