Re: nice mod_perl statistics to share

2002-07-12 Thread Stas Bekman
Kevin Berggren wrote: > Stas Bekman wrote: > >> I've just updated the mod_perl with the latest stats and I'm glad to >> say that the results are nice, so you can show your bosses that they >> did the right choice (or should) ;) >> >> This is the netcraft.com: >> http://perl.apache.org/release/o

Re: nice mod_perl statistics to share

2002-07-09 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote: > The company I work for utilizes multiple webservers sitting behind a > load balancer which in turn are talking to multiple application servers > who in turn are talking to couple of interface servers talking to third > party systems. If

Re: nice mod_perl statistics to share

2002-07-08 Thread Mithun Bhattacharya
--- Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't understand why you think so. If the '/' url is handled by > a > > mod_perl enable server, then mod_perl will show up in the headers, > > proxy server or not. Sure, there'll be some servers where you But do we consider a proxy implementat

Re: nice mod_perl statistics to share

2002-07-08 Thread Stas Bekman
Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > > [...] > >>Also you must not forget that a huge amount of back-end mod_perl servers >>are simply invisible to these scanners because they are running behind a >>proxy. So I won't be surprised if the real number is at least abou

Re: nice mod_perl statistics to share

2002-07-08 Thread Ade Olonoh
> This is the netcraft.com: > http://perl.apache.org/release/outstanding/stats/netcraft.html In case you're interested, here are the stats w/ the hosts per IP calculated starting at Jan 2001. I was curious to see if the increase in hosts had more to do with an increase of virtual hosts (on ISPs

Re: nice mod_perl statistics to share

2002-07-07 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: [...] > Also you must not forget that a huge amount of back-end mod_perl servers > are simply invisible to these scanners because they are running behind a > proxy. So I won't be surprised if the real number is at least about > twice larger. I don't underst

Re: nice mod_perl statistics to share

2002-07-05 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi all, On 5 Jul 2002, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On 5 Jul 2002, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > > > > > RH comes as default with mod_perl compiled as a DSO. > > > > No it does not - it doesn't install Apache by default. > > Come again? RH offers seve

Re: nice mod_perl statistics to share

2002-07-04 Thread Stas Bekman
Michael A Nachbaur wrote: > On Fri, 05 Jul 2002 01:18:46 +0800 Stas Bekman wrote: > >>I've just updated the mod_perl with the latest stats and I'm glad to >>say that the results are nice, so you can show your bosses that they >>did the right choice (or should) ;) > > > Any ideas on what caused

Re: nice mod_perl statistics to share

2002-07-04 Thread Michael A Nachbaur
On Fri, 05 Jul 2002 01:18:46 +0800 Stas Bekman wrote: > I've just updated the mod_perl with the latest stats and I'm glad to > say that the results are nice, so you can show your bosses that they > did the right choice (or should) ;) Any ideas on what caused such a huge jump in usage? Besides th