On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 09:48 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, william ross wrote:
>
>> I did have it set up that way at one point. it worked quite nicely as
>> long as I made the singleton in a subclass of the main Factory (which
>> might be shared by several applications
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, william ross wrote:
> I did have it set up that way at one point. it worked quite nicely as
> long as I made the singleton in a subclass of the main Factory (which
> might be shared by several applications with different configurations).
> i gave up on it in the end because it
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 09:11 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, william ross wrote:
>
>> sorry: i wasn't very clear, was I? I am using a method handler, but I
>> want to pass an object of another class to it each time it is called.
>> The object needs to be created outside o
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 08:37 PM, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
> At 21:30 02.10.2002, william ross wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 08:18 PM, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
>>
>>> At 20:47 02.10.2002, william ross wrote:
but I can't find anything to tell me how to do it. I fe
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, william ross wrote:
> sorry: i wasn't very clear, was I? I am using a method handler, but I
> want to pass an object of another class to it each time it is called.
> The object needs to be created outside of an individual request, and
> therefore presumably in a startup file,
At 21:30 02.10.2002, william ross wrote:
>On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 08:18 PM, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
>
>>At 20:47 02.10.2002, william ross wrote:
>>>but I can't find anything to tell me how to do it. I feel sure I'm
>>>missing something really obvious here?
>>
>>You can configure obje
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 08:18 PM, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
> At 20:47 02.10.2002, william ross wrote:
>> but I can't find anything to tell me how to do it. I feel sure I'm
>> missing something really obvious here?
>
> You can configure objects instead of using static class names. See
At 20:47 02.10.2002, william ross wrote:
>hello,
>
>I've been off-list for a while, so please forgive (and direct) me if this
>is a tired subject.
>
>In short, i'd like to pass through another object on method invocation, in
>addition to the apache request. Ideally the (method)handler would look
