Re: Subroutine xxxx redefined

2001-08-23 Thread Stas Bekman
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Jeremy Howard wrote: > Stas Bekman wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Jeremy Howard wrote: > > > > > Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > Something forces the reload of your files. I'd suggest putting > something > > > > like: > > > > > > > > use Carp; > > > > cluck("I was loaded"); > > >

Re: Subroutine xxxx redefined

2001-08-22 Thread Jeremy Howard
Stas Bekman wrote: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Jeremy Howard wrote: > > > Stas Bekman wrote: > > > Something forces the reload of your files. I'd suggest putting something > > > like: > > > > > > use Carp; > > > cluck("I was loaded"); > > > > > > in one of the files > > > run the server in single serve

Re: Subroutine xxxx redefined

2001-08-22 Thread Stas Bekman
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Jeremy Howard wrote: > Stas Bekman wrote: > > Something forces the reload of your files. I'd suggest putting something > > like: > > > > use Carp; > > cluck("I was loaded"); > > > > in one of the files > > run the server in single server mode (httpd -X) > > and check the trac

Re: Subroutine xxxx redefined

2001-08-22 Thread Jeremy Howard
Stas Bekman wrote: > Something forces the reload of your files. I'd suggest putting something > like: > > use Carp; > cluck("I was loaded"); > > in one of the files > run the server in single server mode (httpd -X) > and check the trace on the second reload. > Nice idea. You might also try 'warn "

Re: Subroutine xxxx redefined

2001-08-22 Thread Stas Bekman
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, matt wrote: > Stas, > > > The behavior you see ["xxx redefined"] is normal. Apache::Reload > > reloads files because it detects that they have changed and then you > > see all the reload messages. Now why your code get Apache::Reload > > confused and makes it believe that yo

Re: Subroutine xxxx redefined

2001-08-22 Thread matt
Stas, > The behavior you see ["xxx redefined"] is normal. Apache::Reload > reloads files because it detects that they have changed and then you > see all the reload messages. Now why your code get Apache::Reload > confused and makes it believe that your modules were changed is > the question. I

Re: Subroutine xxxx redefined

2001-08-22 Thread Stas Bekman
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, matt wrote: > On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, matt wrote: > > > which I obviously want to get rid of before going to production. > ^^ > > Anyway why do use Apache::Reload in production? > > Also you

Re: Subroutine xxxx redefined

2001-08-22 Thread matt
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, matt wrote: > > which I obviously want to get rid of before going to production. ^^ > Anyway why do use Apache::Reload in production? > Also you don't want to have PerlWarn On in production.

Re: Subroutine xxxx redefined

2001-08-21 Thread Stas Bekman
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, matt wrote: > Hi list, > > I'm having a problem that seems to have come up a few times before, > but mine seems to be a little different. > > I am getting hundreds of 'Subroutine redefined' in my Apache > error_log. The amount of mess

Subroutine xxxx redefined

2001-08-20 Thread matt
Hi list, I'm having a problem that seems to have come up a few times before, but mine seems to be a little different. I am getting hundreds of 'Subroutine redefined' in my Apache error_log. The amount of messages I get changes frequently and so far I have not been able