On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Can you do an internal redirect and stuff things in
> pnotes/notes?
haven't tried it but dont see why not. you'd just have to
use $r->prev->pnotes inside the second request.
we actually use err_headers_out in our webmail, but that
code was written befo
> "Matt" == Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So, I'm punting. When I get an error, I have to redirect to a URL,
>> which then has to start all over figuring out why they were sent
>> there. Which is not totally bad, because I have to ask the user some
>> questions in a form, and
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > And for those following along, after further study in the source, it
> > looks like custom_response can be only one of three things: a string,
> > an internal URL (internal redirect) or an external URL (external
> > redirect on error). Same thing as a
On Wed, 09 Feb 2000, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > "Bill" == Bill Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz)
> >> The docs hint that I can use whatever I would put after ErrorDocument
> >> as the arg to custom_response, but also suggest that I can pu
> "Bill" == Bill Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz)
>> The docs hint that I can use whatever I would put after ErrorDocument
>> as the arg to custom_response, but also suggest that I can put "a
>> module" there. Does that mean it's the same styl
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz)
> The docs hint that I can use whatever I would put after ErrorDocument
> as the arg to custom_response, but also suggest that I can put "a
> module" there. Does that mean it's the same style of argument as a
> ->pushhandler(), where I can also put
hi!
>
> I'm trying to write a custom Auth/Authz handler, and want to handle
> the failure within my module as well, sharing some variables that I've
> already determined during the failure. I can't output content during
> the Authz phase (or can I?), so I need to set up a very custom
> handler.
The docs hint that I can use whatever I would put after ErrorDocument
as the arg to custom_response, but also suggest that I can put "a
module" there. Does that mean it's the same style of argument as a
->pushhandler(), where I can also put a coderef?
I'm trying to write a custom Auth/Authz han